Magnetic Synthesizer

How do you know that? stats on comments? and where can I go to see the said support from former gov employees? I'm curious, very.

Explain your conspiracy, why would anyone run such a disinformation campaign? To further discredit legitimate skeptics? What's the point fo this and the fat man? Smoke is from the disentigrated matter which falls like some sort of dust.

What are the proportions of politicians who are full of shit? http://www.therebel.media/mulcair_should_listen_to_his_old_self To illustrate how I sure I am, I do not have a uniquevocal position on wether Mr Mulcair is there beacause: A. He is virtuous. B. His entire scheme is a reaction to the demographic and serves to get elected in order to pursue selfish accomplishements. In B, he probably realized hwo popular leftism was and decided to go that way. If he disregards his knowledge of free markets and gov intervention then this will discredit his integrity in my eyes further. But this is not about him, this is about a clear exemple who's outcome will determine some premises which are behind such lack of conviction as to the man's (not him in particular) integrity. Those premises are on a tipping edge and need settling. Just like any premis which I have failed to find comprehensive data for. The reason I am an An-cap is because I assimilated some data presented by FDR on matter which I was never presented so respectully (without using as much dubious tactics). I hold to a degree a rebel principle which is to rebel against any lack of disclosure from a party who is well capable to provide it but turns down the opportunity. The value of that principle bias is only reinforced overtime.

What is the problem with no one, no neiboors you disagree with running the show in fornt of your kids?

http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3038/gandalf-the-hypocritical-dbag-call-in-show-july-29th-2015 at 3h24m or a little ater it jumps to the previous podcast. UUURRH! And if you try to jump past that point it does the same thing, as if the last 30m of the podcasts are a gosth trap. This leads me to my 2nd point. You cannot load a point of the podcast without loading all of the previous ones! this means that to get to 3h20 I ahd to reaload tens of MB over again! U hurt my Canadian bandwith cap Also a question, are all podcasts available on youtube? I can`t seem to find the: Conquering Stefan’s Ancestors - Call In Show - August 7th, 2015''You recently talked about the role of Donald Trump in the presidential campaign and I thought some comments were inconsistent with what I understood you stand for on political action as a method for achieving a free society. Don't you think we should pursue any type of activity that could get people closer to rational and philosophical thinking and that political action is one of those activities?''

Can someone define cookie-cutter and Character Builder Research and text is contradictory or atleast not clear to me: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cookie-cutter

Is agnosticism limited to a position on god's existence? or is god just an exemple of what someone can be agnostic about. In terms of language and grammar.

http://money.cnn.com/data/markets/ so now is it going to fall back to shit? is this when the showdown gets real? nvm I looked at the history of data, and it might be just a bump.

?

Blocked in my country. I should probably call it a state from now. My state country My currency money etc. subliminal propaganda. more like THE STATE

Can you point me to some of the smoking guns of your fraud? I like the mathematical ones. I wish I was an expert in the field, but I aimed for other paths. Now imagine you do a rain test and find that there are climate engineering susbtances... now that's a whole new level. I can already see how they could spin this. Frame the problems created by climate engineering as those of warming eventually, optionally.

You realise that what is reffered to as law is coercion. Also I would like to add that all this bs in the environement (the system) seems to promote the ill-intentioned and harm the well-intentioned. What exactly do you want to see? Nice graphic representations. On a fun note, in ethics class, we were presented the kolberg's theory on stages of moral developpement. and the teahcer was like '' I believe no one of your age can possibly operate from the post-conventional levels''. BS# 21312310, added to database. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development notice ''deference to autority'' is considered a moral stage. Law abidence is an extension of level 1, either by autority or by fantazy ( I briefly went through the ''hard on crime'' rational in 4th grade, or the consideration of the unknown individuals's competence involved in legislation) Only level 2,5 and 6 seem legit. 2 is good for business despite differences in virtue. 3 can be legit only if without 1.

You could just let them play assassin's creed. Kill evil in high places 24/7 blazing, also sometimes statists get in the way, much pleasure. I think some may really like the game.

AAAAAARGGGGHH! I'm gonna create my own, who's gonna tell me how useless that is? come on, I think it's realistic. If it's honest and all with no PR spin. Atleast to spread some ideas, now if they find root in minds is an ungauged problem.#when the time comes -suddenly the silent are going to vote for Libertanism (well I'm not libertarian but see eye-to-eye for other reasons) -some people are gonna wake up -Gonna slow down expansion of the state.

I like your poetic approach. Is there any sort of reply you seek? I see as you are simply entertaining the world through your thread here. As for the NAP issue, using the enviornement to achieve the same as a coercive act without directly coercing, is probably what he is reffering to. There have been situations where the equivalent of coercion are achieved and that by basic short-sighted and limited purview no one is blamed. I would be one of the few that will point out everyone involved inheriting blame for the situation as they feed the cogs of the gears. This reminds me of my favorite cognitive function, so lacking, these days and always, in people.

I think if you get better things in your life it would give you experiences which fall outside that paradigm thus cancelling it. I'm talking quality career and relationships. If people are not singificantly outside of that paradigm, the paradigm cna still survive on ''they are just deceiving me''. So neutral people is not enough, you need to find quality and it needs to be the rule of your environement not the exception. I think it would greatly help to subside the remnants of that trauma. The world of coercion of self and identity by torture is unexplored to me, it looks very bad.

Then my comment does not apply.

The reasoning is that delcaring now is better than waiting for the inevitable reveal.

The clear night sky with the cosmos in view with all it's opportunities and dangers. When the outside of Earth is poorly visible, it feels isolated ( it doesn't feel since thats the habitual default, but when it's not it feels the opposite of isolated). Atleast there is a good material environement, for now. I wish I could say the same in regards to the people.

I think you neither have to be angry or ''forgiving''. Forgiving would be a form of apathy towards his wrong deeds! Face the truth as is, forgiving always seems ot be employed as a deviation from that.

That's some real negative stuff you had to deal with there. I must say I am impressed by your ability to prioritize and identify the differences at play from your point of reference. Great Text, I enjoyed reading it and quickly developped interest in your story. I think I have more questions than answers due to my shortcomings in what appears to be a complex subject. I don't want to impede help towards you. I do not share the same problems and history. But I would suggest the following: That rage will subside and give way to peace if you had enough of: Someone, or multiple individuals who where close to you physicaly (not across the internet) and would be on the same page opinion-wise, ones that could truthfully agree and confirm the reality. They may come from different views, but what I mean by ''same page opinion wise'' is the same side of the battle. I found that when you try to dig into yourself to find out the reasons that cause whatever symptom you can't explain, thinking at what you desire in reaction is a great way to find the answer. I found that what I desire most in reaction to the symptom is the ultimate(core) cure. All you have to do is find out what the cure cures you of, and thats how you can find the hidden cause.

Hey, was it George who commanded the army to not hide behing trees? or both? In the presentation it says it was it Braddock. but 10 seconds later Stefan makes a contradicting comment. In the presentation at 40: 38, it says Braddock issued the order at 50:48: Washington was the one who told the soldiers ''don't hide behind trees''

Belief in axiom.

Yet no one identifies with me when I say access to data is terrible. Maybe this has data on taxes around fiscal freedom: http://www.heritage.org/index/about

Altough I do not have extensive experience. 1.Just leanr computer science yourself, you might be able to fetch what you need ot know and you should be able to get it outisd eof college very easily. 2. You can adapt it to yourself in autonomous leanring, you wont have to deal with bs. 3. You wont ahve a giant debt, do the math, skip the fantazy. Chose Freedom and press on in that realm.