RCali

Hey, FDR. I've recently started writting, and I've just published an article I've been working on on Steemit. It would mean a great deal to me if you would support me by hitting the "vote" button there and share the article. https://steemit.com/life/@ricardocalisto/the-science-of-video-gaming-addiction-and-effects-of-gaming I'd love to hear whatever criticism you have of it.

https://www.gofundme.com/matthew-shayla-braiden-smith You can read the story on that link. It's been all over the news / twitter.

There are 2 genders: male and female.

Presente! I'm from Lisbon. Born and raised.

Trump - my policy, the entire set of them, is based on giving the power back to the people. It's about people creating jobs themselves, and bringing the money back into the country through productivity and trade. It doesn't matter that I have the support of this party of the other, as the only thing the government will be doing is basic admnistrative work. Justice and defense. It will be, once again, like in the great time of american prosperity, where the people will be given the chance to work hard and suceed as a result of it. It's not about making the republican party great again, it's about making America great again.

You can say that over and over again, but won't change the fact that a Hillary Clinton victory would destroy civilization and a Trump victory will more likely than not bring us closer to freedom. In the very least pause the advancement of the state. Yes, in this situation voting can remain consistent with the NAP, as you wouldn't be promoting the state, but the diminishing of it. And if you decide not to fight against Hillary in any way possible you are letting her advance, thus allowing the further destruction of the NAP. We need to make do with whatever possibilities we have in this shitty situation. Trump seems to be the best choice.

If there's a way to abolish the government within 1 month, do enlighten us. It has to be sustainable, though. I don't know what you're talking about in the last bit or about owning you.

Dsayers, let me put this into perspective. I'll asume you want the best for humans in general and I assume you want the best for freedom and a voluntaristic society in the future. Let's say we have 3 options. First option is to participate in political voting. And that voting would be towards Hillary Clinton. The antithesis of freedom and anarchy and progression and evolution. The antithesis of good and morality. Second option is to participate in political voting. For Donald Trump. He's a statist and not in any way a voluntarist. Maybe not even a capitalist. He promotes free speech and a freer existance than what is true today. He promotes smaller government and he definitely doesn't want to go into WW3. Third option is to not participate in political voting. Keep doing what many of us have been doing and spread the message of freedom and philosophy. Considering how likely it is that one of the two mentioned will take over the presidency (almost entirely likely) ignoring this is irresponsible. If you ignore the first two possibilities considering the consequences they can have you are either choosing stubbornly to remain dogmatic to a principle or not understanding just how important these options and their outcomes are. What would happen if Hillary wins? What would happen if Trump wins? That's easy. Catastrophe for the first - this is a certainty. For the second... Probably the opposite, and progress towards something better. Even if not progress, a definite pause. One of these two will take power, and if you decide to NOT help the second get there, you ARE responsible if the first gets into power. You WILL be responsible if the worst happens and the USA collapses because of this. There are three options and only two of them are mutually exclusive. Do not think you are not being faithful to the NAP by voting Trump. I'd argue you would be BREAKING the NAP if you do NOT vote Trump, because of what I've previously stated. Hillary leads to certain doom while Trump leads to at minimum more time bought. There's the good old quote: "The only thing necessary of the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." It is not a pretty thing that we are reduced to voting and following a politian... But it is certainly better than the alternative. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Delicious.

I'm a proud white male with two middle fingers .!. .!. and I regularly use words like fuck you, stupid feminists. Long live the patriarchy.

I make his my words.

Boasting has a function, just like judging has. You boast and judge morality to keep evil at bay. It's the way we have to stay safe and identify danger. Without this and total tolerance of others, you'd live among criminals and generally shit people. And shit people are a bunch that many people here in the forums grown among. Tell them to get accostumed to it and go back to it, because judging is something you should not do. Responses are, most likely, not going to be too positive. What's the worst: judging someone's character too soon, with too little information, or to not judge at all and be tolerant, regardless of information?

Can Hilary dance like this? I think not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2Sz_fTfr1E

I'm no expert at body language, to say the least, but having watched that video, it was the first thing that came to mind. She lies all throughout it, and even a moron at this such as me can see it clearly.

Racism is not prejudice towards a race but prejudice against an individual that's of a certain race...????

Yes. Wait, no. I don't know.

So basically, you accept that races have differences, but you reject that races have differences. OK.

Well, considering the following definition: - a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others. - hatred or intolerance of another race or other races. I'm a racist. Considering the achievements of each individual civilization... Western pulls ahead... Massively. Whites don't have the highest average IQ in the world... But no one comes close in terms of creativity. I do think these are the most important aspects for the evolution of human kind and more and more, lately, I've been thinking... Whites just seem like the best for the future. Having said that, it matters only for my own reproduction. For that second part of the definition, I do not hate other races and I'm not intolerant of them. I'm intolerant of a lot of culture that comes with them, though, such as african culture for blacks. They speak really loudly and they don't give much of a shit for their children. They come from violent backgrounds, very commonly. Maybe I am a racist. Who cares. What matters is that I respect each person's individual moral rights. Which I do, and will fight to protect them, no matter what race they are.

The amount of r behavior in this trailer has proven almost unbearable. It would be cruel to have Stefan go through the entire movie. It's not like this hasn't been done before, anyway.

I am bothered, that I will cease to exist. Greatly. It's depressing that there is not hope to live on forever, but it's even more depressing if you let this thought consume you, and with that, not use what time is given to you to live, and make others' lives better, and rememberable, and even influence generations to come in this manner. In that way, you can be eternal. Make great enough works, and history will remember you. Maybe not forever - or not likely at all - but having influenced people in your lifestime so that you may be spoken of in millenia is quite the achievement. And, really, you don't just die randomly. There's no such a thing as randomness in death or life. There's chance. You can manipulate this chance to your advantage. Such as, if you want reduced chance of heart attack, you'll eat healthy food, sleep well, and exercise. If you want to decrease chance of being decapitated by crazy people, you'll stay away from South Africa. If you want to increase the chance of finding a good mate, you'll increase your value through many possible means. There's no randomness in any of this. You may think so, but it's because you cannot see all of the equation, or any of it, and, as such, you think it doesn't exist. But it does. The opposite of what I just said, though, is true for existance of gods. A false equation has been created for religion. It is false because it doesn't comply to the cientific method, and, if it doesn't comply to cientific method, it doesn't exist. How do we live as atheists? Well, the same way people lived before religion was created, and after it was. We work hard to survive and to learn the truth.

The plan is to keep spreading philosophy and peace, and that one day, there will be no one left complying to the system, and so it shall fall, through ignoration.

Taxes are not voluntary.

I don't think there's a better way to describe it. These lower IQ people don't actually realize they can't see just how smarter he is because of exactly this. They are inferior.

I've stopped reading right here. Do you know what taxes are? Taxes aren't created. They are stolen. Rabbits turning into wolves? Uhmmm... Basic biology? No. That will not happen. I'm not sure how long you've been studying Stefan's ideas, but you're not taking into account the most important one, he's been sharing. Change through peace. Your equation isn't taking into account that when the change will happen, it will be voluntary. The system (the state) will fall through mass ignoration. People will know the state is an abusive establishment and that it isn't there for the benefit of anyone but themselves. Children will be raised peacefuly and with no abusing. If you raise children in such a manner, identifying any threats will be much easier, and identifying manipulation will be as easy as going outside and seeing if it rains. They will not need to extensively study philosophy to figure this out, because they've been EXPERIENCING this philosophy since they've been born. If you learn to cook something better than before, you're never going to go back and cook it in the previous way.

Hello, Karl. I'm going to keep this response short, as I have little time, currently, but hope it's helpful. Yes. This is obvious, seeing as there's been a civilizational cycle all throughout history. Wolves create civilizations, rabbits destroy them. Rabbits are not made extinct, each time, though. They do prevail, and corrupt the wolves' work at the soonest moment. Why is it important here to imagine a solution that isn't the abolition of the immoral institution that is the state? If we're still talking economy, that's the solution. The economic system that is in place is mercantilism, and, as history proves it, is not sustainable. The freer the markets, though, the more sustainable they are. Again, shown by history. There are no hugs to be partaken between rabbits and wolves. There's no possibility of balance between fire and water. You cannot both heal and destroy. This is the nature of r/K. Duality. Both cannot live in harmony, such are the differences. One thrives in peace and stability and security. The other thrives in stressful environments and chaos and sexuality. You will never have both embrace a happy medium of their different lifestyles. Not that this matters, since a half r economic system is still an immoral system, therefore, void and null, and will eventually crash. And to answer the last bit, I can think of a great proverb. "Lions do not concern themselves with the opinions of sheep." We are different species. They speak, move and eat like the rest of us, but they will care for us just as much as you'll see a cat worrying about a dog. Their will and well being will always come before ours. And vice versa.