Jsbrads
Member-
Posts
463 -
Joined
-
Days Won
6
Everything posted by Jsbrads
-
Did God err in making Adam ruler over Eve?
Jsbrads replied to Gnostic Bishop's topic in Atheism and Religion
A creature can be ruled by instinct without being ruled by emotion. -
Is WWIII Upon Us? What Do We Do Now?
Jsbrads replied to Siegfried von Walheim's topic in Current Events
Firstly Assad may be stupid, but he doesn’t have to be stupid to use chemical weapons. Assad used chemical weapons in the past and he wasn’t punished for doing so, therefore his behavior is within normal human behavior when he uses it again. Were Assad to use chemical weapons numerous times and be seriously punished every time he used it and he failed to learn to stop using it, only then if he uses it again can we conclude he is stupid. Without that data, his intelligence cannot be determined. -
Is he eating enough? Kind of along the same idea as above, were he eating enough foods, he would not be taking as much from you and it would be less taxing...
-
RE: 'Defending a Free Society?'
Jsbrads replied to barn's topic in Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
The only free societies in this world was created thru revolution. Countless pacifistic attempts have failed time and time again. Much like socialism, you can try one more time, but I prefer Sic Semper Tyranus! -
While you are right, prior to the creation of our universe, there were no laws of physics, cosmologists today still maintain that certain laws would still remain, one in particular being conservation of energy. Additionally, as hokey as this sounds, the quantity of energy needed to create our universe would have to be so precise that it may not be possible for our universe to be created by accident...
-
The tree of knowledge good and evil does not grant you new information. It grants subjectivity. Prior to the tree, things could be correct or incorrect, but don’t hold value judgements. And as to fathers and mothers, they close their eyes to the future and create bastards out of wedlock thru stupidity and blindness, not choosing evil, but acting without forethought, their action contained choice and knowledge without intent. I will visit upon the third and fourth generation... Facts don’t care about your feelings.
-
Did God err in making Adam ruler over Eve?
Jsbrads replied to Gnostic Bishop's topic in Atheism and Religion
Nakedness isn’t a problem for someone who isn’t partially ruled by emotion. -
Compressed air isn’t the problem, when whales dive deep below the surface their lungs are crushed by the external pressure and their lungs subsequentially compress the air within. Rather their lungs, blood, blood vessels, etc react differently to the compressed air than ours.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Just got an engineering job! now I’m moving down near San Diego. My current thought is to Airbnb to start.
-
It was realized not too long ago, that air breathing “fish” like whales dive far deeper than we originally thought and their body compressed and their density increases as they swim down, only they don’t get “the bends”.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
No one really makes that claim. The point of lightweight bones is to minimize weight while handling fairly lightweight loads. Not to have heavier bones which aren’t needed when weight is an evolutionary issue. Bone density is very important for humans, and some older females have a disorder in which their bones are too weak. This has neligble impact on the weight of the woman, who’s muscles, internal parts still weigh exactly the same and the bones are still fairly heavy despite being compromised in strength. i presume you aren’t claiming the TRex was a svelte lilthe ballet dancer of the dinosaur community. Rather a heavy monster with legs muscles, a tail, and a huge skull protecting an itty little brain. Saving a few pounds on the bone density, despite compromising bone strength, has little impact on the total weight of the creature measured in tonnage. And he/she pales in comparison to the size, height and tonnage of other large herbivores of those earlier epochs.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lower gravity would have little to no impact on waterbourne creatures. The water pressure is equally distributed all over the body’s surface.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Eliz. Humans had choice before sin by definition. Gnost. visiting sin onto future generations... Have you heard of fetal alcohol syndrome? Crack babies? Do you know that 85% of prison pop come from single parent homes? The question isn’t is this evil, it is! The question is who did it?! The parents are evil, so don’t attribute to God what is done by man.
-
Did God err in making Adam ruler over Eve?
Jsbrads replied to Gnostic Bishop's topic in Atheism and Religion
I would have made the same error the first time. Doesn’t mean I have to be a stupid beast and repeat the error the second time -
Yes, lightweight bones are good, if you have a lightweight body to go along with it. TRex haunches would crush lightweight bones.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I’m not calling you a liar. Memory is very malleable. Even had your memory told you she would call at 10:45am on Monday, and she called exactly then, it would not indicate anything. If there is such a thing as telepathy or a prescient experience, this isn’t it. Sorry to hear of these troubles. Wish y’all the best. Think about your situation, chat about it with friends and here’s to hoping you find more peace.
-
Did God err in making Adam ruler over Eve?
Jsbrads replied to Gnostic Bishop's topic in Atheism and Religion
Right? You think a woman can’t cut a man with a look? Goodboy, beautiful words and I believe them. It is an absolute rule for relations, a heart reflects a heart like water reflects a face. Proverbs? -
The size of dinosaurs discussed above triggered me to think of how gravity could be the same yet acceleration due to gravity could be different. The square-cube law makes them fairly unbelievable. Barn, 1 my theory doesn’t contradict relativity light departing a moving vehicle moves at c and is blue or red shifted. Not plus V. 2 the expansion of the universe had inflation before there was matter, expansion was “faster” than light, but didn’t break relativity because nothing actually moved. There are galaxies that are moving away from us right now that are “moving” faster than light. 3 yes, that is a problem, which is why you would have to use a electric method of weight measurement and record that info for later. 4 The theory is that time speed changes everywhere in the universe at the same time, making it impossible to see changes without very dedicated longitudinal reasearch into the changes of weight on a planet, using non-mass based measure to record data. Universal expansion is universal, includes our moon orbit too, but on too small a scale to affect the trajectory of the planets before the heat death of the universe. Its really funny how we take so many things for granted with how we measure things. Simple metal springs for weight calibrated by other weights, but now new modern force transducers also calibrated by weights. Length, use something of known length. Force? Back to weights... Time? Use base 60 Babylonian numbers to divide the day. Temperature? We are cavemen with that...
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I totally agree without prior evidence that two people having sex entangle their magnetic fields. But not two people standing two or three feet away? Let alone further? As to any sort of telepathy, large claims and all. Russians did huge studies hoping to find something, they came up with nothing. That isn’t proof. But it ain’t nothing.
-
Did God err in making Adam ruler over Eve?
Jsbrads replied to Gnostic Bishop's topic in Atheism and Religion
The curse isn’t that man will rule over women. The curse is said to a woman, essentially, if she doesn’t lift herself above her base nature, she will let a man rule her, she will allow a man who operates at a base human level to command her. Biker men and women always come to my mind when I am reminded of this line. #NotAllBikers When I think of healthy, intelligent, engaged communicating couples, this curse is the furthest description from reality. -
I don’t think so. My premise is that velocity of time changes very slowly while tied to the expansion of the universe, so 65 million yrs ago it was just different enough, but not vastly different. Also the velocity of time would have changed very rapidly in the first few seconds during inflation, then slower after first 100,000 “yrs”. Slower change yet after 1 billion... currently it would be negligible over long periods of time, either 1. as a ratio to the entire age of the universe, or 2. to the current size of the universe. If tied to the size, we don’t know if expansion is accelerating, slowing, or asymptotically approaching some non-“crunch” stable value. (There is no reason to believe the velocity of time isn’t tied to either of these 2 values, or perhaps a 3rd value or a combo.) Light shouldn’t be impacted by this at all, or if it is, no source of light is so constant that the changes we might seek would be visible above the noise for a very long time (perhaps many millennia). Perhaps a longitudinal study over 100,000 yrs we might notice a sample of mass like the roundest silicon sphere might be slightly heavier on some force transducer circuit, that isn’t calibrated with mass samples. Perhaps it can even be designed that the electrical circuit would amplify that change, eg the circuit would read a higher value because of the same change in the velocity of time. I would note that even if some Mammoths were bigger than African elephants, that wouldn’t have been due to differences in acceleration due to gravity (over the last 10,000 yrs) but far more likely due to temperature, our current theory why many large creatures went extinct recently or it could be over-hunting by humans who became more intelligent very recently. Other examples that might support this theory, may include whales. They might have been fairly big, walking on land was getting harder, they moved to shallows, then deeper water adapting, etc. This isn’t evidence of anything, merely a curious investigation point. Access their mitochondrial ancestral DNA, enter the data into a simulation program (which doesn’t exist today) and see what they looked like, body mass while they were walking [assumption] and what kind of stresses were their legs under...
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hollow earth would still not change in mass.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
What if the mass of the planet hasn’t changed at all in 65 million yrs? What if the speed of time changes as the umiverse expands? Then if the value of time changed, the attractive force could be the same but the difference in the speed of time could alter the acceleration, less acceleration, less pressure on the bones, larger creatures would have been competitive.
- 46 replies
-
- expanding earth
- gravity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: