King David

I look at the world from a Gnostic point point of view, Toxo and other critters combine to deny reality from your consciousness. They can promote risky behaviors via manipulation of your gut and the nerves in the dermis. Once your immune system is compromised they really kick it in to gear, perhaps associated with dementia

I am in the same place right now. When you know what to look for everything is on display right in the open. What really irks me is how women one assume the right to your attention and two how they assume the role of officer of your value. Especially if they find you attractive, they almost immediately perform a utility assessment which in their mind is a signal for you to acknowledge and worship their beauty. The nerve of an aesthetic bimbo whom is good at nothing other than knowing precisely when best to spread her legs stands to maximize her benefit, standing their with a stupid smirk on her face is going to tell me what my value is. Yeah right. There is no appropriate reaction to this little show of "affection". A guy does this and generally I would begin competition with him or even in some cases begin hostilities. With a women all you can do is accept defeat and do your best to ignore her. What is ironic is that as I see this as a defeat, other women nearby observe the exchange get curious in your attractiveness because the see it as flattery, which prompt their own assessment. Fuck my life.

By this logic it is safe to assume all sex ever was all acts of rape being that men convince women of stupid shit all the time to get them to acknowledge consent to sex. I don't think women even understand the same words as me most the time everything spoken to women by me is fraud in that sense.

@1:31 truer words never spoken! All you atheists worship one god or another, they might even be virtuous gods in many cases but your brain determines that you make an idol out of something. It's up to you to decide whether or not yours is false.

I am always the buzz kill on my last posts lol. I don't go for dramatic but it always comes out like that.

Now there is a title I can get behind if I ever saw one!

"I believe you are stating that you are victimised by Simps and so your hostility to them can be seen as self defence. Although Stef talks about guilt in this video, I think the same can be generalised out to your reaction her." You are probably right, I do feel that I am victimized by Simps and the entire matrix. So what? Our culture ruins people, our medical doctrine kills by the thousands and none of them will ever face a single consequence. People from the matrix are getting more neurotic about behavior and soon it will be a corporate/gov't fascist hybrid that dictates ALL of our behavior, they are in the process of making laws about such things right now. My position that my life would be easier if they were all dead as it seems there is no way to change course seems quite reasonable.

You are telling me I should feel bad for a simp, whom is the very cause of the problems in society today? The simps that have the same access to youtube that I do yet still empower women and the state. That I am supposed to be compassionate because they have a sheltered past? I can have empathy for them but no I am not in the practice of rehabilitation nor making any special allowances for them. Unless they do something, anything for me every single person from the matrix gets the exact same treatment from myself. That is I completely ignore their existence and wishes men and women. My social life has been made miserable by fags like these, maybe if they perceive enough hostility they might get the picture but I would rather see them all die anyways.

Well, the way I see it is if simps want to simp go ahead and let them. This is not a phenomenon that effects men in general, just a small percentage of puss beggers with more money than brains. The sooner these men get taken to the cleaners for the promise of a wiff of puntang the better.

I don't see how this is a men's issue

At his age if he hit back he should be kicking her ass. The only thing that prevented her from being left in a bloody pulp on the street for the mob to take care of was his servitude to his mother/female. If they call her the mother of the year he should be applauded for servile son of the season. Another example of women abusing social status to avoid physical harm that they would otherwise be recipients of.

I don't know if I'm more shocked at the story as I am that the police did something very valuable. This is a case where the punishment should fit the crime

The state is not the only problem with women today, their feminine charm muscles have become atrophy. Women all my life have claimed they are my equal but this only occurs when I grant them equality concessions (save my uni class, I always say that the only thing a woman can do as well as a man is think). It's akin to play fighting with a child, they think they are winning because you take it easy on them but these are not children they are adults, on some level they have to realize they are being molly coddled. Does this slow these grown adults from perpetuating victimhood and bitch they are maltreated? nope they just keep trudging along under the pretense that everything is on perfectly even footing taking as much power as there is available. Women today have no comprehension of the rights and privilege they enjoy. An analogy would be if the Royal family was widely indignant about their lot and being hounded by paparazzi, would I be angry with a Royal that did not recognize their privilege due to ignorance? Not really, but I certainly wouldn't worry myself much about their well being. Royals of course know better than to act like that because they are classy and care about self preservation...I wish with all my heart I could say the same for women. You can just add their inability to take responsibility for their responsibility to the long list of fails.

Listening to Stefan talk about dating is like listening to Kernel Sanders talk about a New York fashion show. Marriage is not an option, women need to relearn how to make a mans life better with them in it. Who is to say that you will not be lonely when you are married? Most women are not good companions, get a dog. Women everywhere these days think nothing of bossing a man, this is simply not acceptable I will not even stay in the place if some female thinks she can command me, I simply withdraw as there are no viable options available to confront this mentality.

A driver's licence and get loser pissed on your 18th bday. That is how the west does it

What is really sad is that they probably enjoyed dressing up for this.

MGTOW is in my humble opinion the result of economic and technological developments. MGTOW has grown not just with the internet growth in the late 90's, but more so since the crash of the stock market in 08'. In the old days such a crash would have driven men to radicalism, militarism, politic ism, and potentially many other ism's. Now, finally in the information age we are talking instead of dueling, and lo and behold us former duelists have found we have something rather remarkable in common. We have found that a life of servitude, ego checks, and pussy pandering is not the only choice available to men. In fact, there are many, many choices available to said men. KD

This is a good version, a little weak on imagery but gets the point across. For me I recognize the social significance of the bible but there is more than meets the eye. Adam and Eve was a Shamanistic tale dating back at least 30 000 years. Probably more like double that. The tree of knowledge for me represents exponential growth and inter-connection. For exponential growth to occur (which human survival demands) conditions and rules must be adhered to. Next stop Leviticus. KD

(1) That the supernatural (god) is natural (phenomena i.e. Zeus's lightening) = they are one (everything is made from the same stuff/energy?) = 1/1 = cancelling out = no distinction necessary = "god" is then a misnomer for the unknown. 1/1 = 1 What you are talking about I think is electricity. Yes, the electron is not"knowable". However, there does seem to be a disproportionate capacity of recoverable energy bound up in that stubborn little sun of a bitch. I mean, quantitatively (I know you guys like that word) the proton carries almost 100% of atomic mass, unfortunately it only carries only a measly of 1+ electromagnetic quanta for all of its bravado. The almighty electron on the other hand, well is has no mass, tiny wavelength, temperamental disposition but all of the power. Goddamn, you ever seen a 80 tonne panzer 5 roll up on your position powered by nothing more than than a diesel electric motor(me neither but it sounds scary)? Hey! said electron carries some ballast in the atomic scale doesn't it? lux felix, I do not know if this was a reference to my comments but I hope you are not trying to straw man my arguments to a "this is what we do not know about the universe" deity, that is not what I am going for. I didn't even begin you read # 4&5 points. Do you see me standing on an ivory tower commanding doctrine to my local fiefdom to the benefit of my local monopoly? I have nothing to gain or loose going against the grain, this is my intellectual pursuit of reality. My spirit for integrity is as fierce as you will ever encounter, admittedly I am that to a fault. All I can say is this: if your measured margins for errors are overwhelming your counter forces(ie gravity vs electro-magnetism), then who gives a shit about the counter forces (strong nuclear forces)? F your devil is in the details and look at the big picture. What are the predominant process? What is the end product of the predominant process? Can I relate to the energy balance before process? can I relate to the energy balance after process? How do any of these relationships relate to me and what does it mean? These are the question that science is phenomenal at revealing but are never truly addressed. "Oh, we need funding to figure our new quark flavor out! that will fix quantum" is the mantra. Feel free to explore my content to unearth my appreciation for academic integrity. Funny enough that seems to me to be what the whole of the modern human world (of which I have no claims to be a part of) seems to be entirely void of.

Did the universe and life begin at the behest of a divine consciousness? Who the hell knows? it appears the universe is well structured, and given time and encouragement rewards intelligence. That which it is most likely came from something that embodied that characteristic, so I say yes. The probability that a structured system that consistently rewards organization resulted from a few random molecules of deuteron in a vast sea of hydrogen plasma during the big bang is not good. What I am referring to as "intelligent" is primarily bifurcating structures. Bifurcation is sublime and effective, the universe rewards such organization. Electricity does it, gravity fed streams do it, your brain neurons do it, cardiovascular, pulmonary systems, caul fat, plant, and fungi all do it. It is peculiar, it looks the same regardless of scale. It has the ability to work more sophisticated systems into an already valid and necessary raison d'etre. Considering that fungi inhabited the planet a good while before any thing else had this structure and that many vital plant and animal systems share it suggest they all began with fungi in common. I bet that is why they first incorrectly categorized fungi as a plant, because the plant looks so much like it. Truth is that fungi's metabolism resembles that of mammals most closely than anything else, which I might add were actually proliferating the land prior to reptiles and dinosaurs had their reigns. I am not talking about eating fungi (although they are good for you), I am talking about the physiological addiction to carbs that we experience being determined by candida albicans populating your gut. Albeit, this is a modern agricultural phenomenon to be so dependent on them, it sure seems to play well to our fungi's Modus Operandi. As Stemets points out, fungi love calamity. No matter how we behave, we are doing fungi a great service. In fact, the worse we behave the more they are benefactors from our activity. Nothing has,or could spread fungi and the food stuffs of fungi around the planet better than humans. We win, they win. We loose, they win. What I mean about sexual desire and anxiety relating to fungi is that I suggest they are puppet masters of many of our instincts, and as such they are benefiting by encouraging sexual desire, addiction, fear, and all the other lovely things we do as evolutionary masterpieces. And they do this always to further their own assured proliferation. Considering our success at this venture, it is hard to imagine this being anything but the case.

Fact # 1: Life has been spawned out of celestial events of magnitudes far greater than that of solar fusion. Fact# 2: Life on earth has survived epic catastrophe innumerable times and still maintains a similar disposition. The ediacaran fauna being the only exception. You know circa 500 000 000 years ago. Fact # 3: The resulting impact from your actions will affect the future course of events on precisely how entropy will increase. A non-trivial solution with respect to time. This is not wunderlust. No one touched on how that life seems to slow the increase of entropy, just like the majority of our highly specialized and designed engineering processes (fact # 4 if your're counting). Fungi is interesting to me because 1: it is entirely pervasive, 2: it seems to be linked to your basic instincts and therefore affects your consciousness. If it and virus are linked to your consciousness then you can play with a little Descartes and see how that goes for you. This is new to science and the evidence to suggest this is case is growing. I can tell you from experience that during my religious rituals I have come to filter out immensely powerful carbohydrate craving (fungi jet fuel), as well as sexual desire and anxiety. I have conquered it on my own skin. It can build a ruthless network comprising your skin and guts, leading to the grandmother of all illness in immune system disorder. Heck, the poster child of western medicine (antibiotics) is derived from fungi. Speculate? I dare say "why the hell not".

Something dawned on me this morning. IF I was so bold as to draw an academic line between the social sciences and lets say physical science. If you were to compare their respective functioning theories, and then ask why never once in my entire education grade 1-b.sc. did I ever hear the mention of pussy power during my studies. If you were to compare the state of social sciences and they happened to be equal to the academic state of physics today, it would look something like, well to be honest there is no good analogy except where they had it that all the fundamental laws of physics were in reverse. Nothing would explain anything at all and there simply would not be physical science. Basically, the entirety of academia is so far in the bag on this one it is truly scary, that not one prominent academic ever has even come close to formalizing the patterns of male-female relationships in an objective matter. And what makes is worse is there was not even feminism to contend with at least before the last 150 years. A few poignant quotes from notable dignitaries, that is all that history has to offer us as to the nature of women. What a travesty of honesty, and integrity. KD

Danger Theory: As a society becomes objectively and empirically more safe, women will feign or invent issues of alleged subjective danger and/or oppression of women so as to advance and entrench the cultural, social, and legal powers, goals, and agenda of organized gynocracy.

I hadn't read all the ideas here, however I might offer this little tid bit. 97 % of the energy bound up in the universe is dark, Another 3 % of energy is dark matter. I think that leaves around .01% of the rest of everything is that which we know see, and measure. Which I might add in that 0.01% we cannot even see everything because it is still travelling here from the other side of the universe. We just assume its there. Okay, so that is by no means a proof of God, however the point is that you should staggering back going "how can there possibly be so much stuff?". At the very least you have to consider that if there were a God, then what the hell does he have to bother uploading your consciousness with faith, or anything else for that matter? I hadn't watched the determinism video either, because the way I look at it is that life has an ulterior from what we experience. It doesn't matter what you do in life, your mark and impression is made. Life succeeding is what is deterministic, there is no way to stop it from occurring. Life is tenacious, it is brilliant, it is economical, it is diverse, an unstoppable force. Life is working against entropy, the things that observably work against entropy overwhelmingly are designed implements. Therefore life is for all intents and purpose a designed implement (pun intended). You fulfill the role which you are designed to do whether you accept it or not, you cannot erase the energy exchanges that you have influence on. They have been frozen in time and will continue to influence how future energy exchanges are going to occur. These are facts. I would add to this some wisdom from the great Paul Stemets. Whether you live, breath, shit, or die,you will be invariably feeding and moving fungi. Fungi have been having sex longer than your mother (sorry I wouldn't resist). 1.3 billion years activity on planet earth in a measured capacity, all for the creation of a little thing called top soil. 99% of biomass on planet earth happens to occur within the top 6" of soil or muck covering rocks and minerals. Every atom in your body was once part of a mycelial network. Fungi and virus observably mess with dna, they lichen,and they do other absolutely marvelous things we cannot begin to comprehend since before our time, and will continue long after our time. The universe has more tricks in it than we will ever know, yet we think we can stamp our feet and claim empirically we have disproved gods existence. I don't see it.

Again, am not against leaders if they do not have forceful control of me. Like is said I should call myself a voluntarist. Wording is important, because most people are mouth breathers (not sure what this particular handle insinuates, if my nose is plugged or am swimming I tend to breath through my mouth). Structures as I am referring to them would be something like the trade networks that delivered salt throughout ancient history. Generally speaking international trade was not hindered by the state, and business expanded and thrived under such conditions (duh). http://www.ancient.eu/article/115/ As the trade structures grew in sophistication their capacity to perform their services grew by such bounds that new and larger (competing) settlements became possible. Without the flourishing of trade and hierarchical efficiency I don't see how humans ever could have escaped tribalism.