Anuojat

Volunteer as player or DM?

So... as its already 2017 i think we would have to conclude this group/idea being pretty much dead without strong DM or/and leader?

Youre welcome. Incidentally i DO know and have friend who works in the field. Not YET as fully fledged climate scientist but definately knowledable on the matter and very much on the "calm down and let think and look the science" camp. And yes he is fellow member of FDR.

Oh my bad i misunderstood you My apologiez (typo i know)

You quoted Dylan not anyone else.

Besides Concurring with that Mole said, I want to point out that this could exactly be the case with Poholer54 he heard Stefan talking about the "magic" multiplier and stopped lisening further because its equally misrepresentetative of what climate scientist say. Now you could say he SHOULD have kep lisening more of stefans videos but... isint that the same rule youre talking about here? Who is this thread (Or potholer54) has ever said anything like that? I dont recall him ever saying that in his videos and i dont see evidence of anyone here or other threads about his videos advocating for government "solution".

Regarding Lord Monckton, "Manipulated" Datsets and Impact of water vapor and cloud cover and glaciers check potholer54's entire playlist he has adressed and talked about these: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP Parts 17-21 Are of Monckton and Glaciers/Cloudcover/watervapor/Glaciers are Parts 2, 22, 29 and 30 (for part 29 sources.)

Being former Socialist Christian i can say that i very muhc concur and that i was my experience between ages 17-23. I be lieved things were kinda just right (though i believed in objective moralitys existance along with this urge for consistancy) but... this "muh feelings" and "i must NOT be proven wrong" was product of being shuffed into public school and daycare with nary a say about my feelings AND in school being wrong was punished both by teachers and bullies. So making shit up talking vaguely was all part the survival mode.. that for myself and for these people nowdays lasted to adulthood. Its inner baby/child screaming for emphaty and understanding from people not responceable for its absence. When you "debate" people like this they literally perceive you presenting facts as you saying that theyre feelings and unmet needs dont matter. And also that theyre abusive/neglectful parents were RIGHT and now you are the bad parent/authority.

"utopian ideal" removed and youd have the defination i use for anarchy. BIG differance since when one uses the word "utopian" its way to discredits the possibility of somethign in the defination. Anarchism as understand it, simple mean NO RULERS, RULES and LAWS = Can be morally ok/neutral. Automation you mean perhaps? And whats wagecucking mean? Is it like wage fixing or collusion? If thats what it is then we have to keep in mind the automationwas only possible because companies and induviduals and organizations (NOT the current legal fictions we call corporations) made progress towards in the free market (capitalism) and free market of ideas (scientific method). Which both are part of anarchy, free market has no rulers (authority like dentists may exist but no political rulers) and neither does science as you know from seeing soem of your others posts, science is not and SHOULD not be democratic but based on evidence, valid repeatable/testable theories.

You made the assertion that it sounded the same. I am not going to assume you know what youre talking about until you explain it your own words and i refuse to go "looking things up", ive heard this request/demand way too many times to know it usually means the person either has no clue about what they are talking about or they want YOU to be the one disproving somethign they asserted. You make the assertion you have to be the one to make your case. THEN i will look it up if you cite passages from both voluntarist anarchy and from communist manifesto.

What do you mean by "Anarchist utopia"? If it has anythign to do with Communist manifesto then a Free voluntarist society certainly doesnt fit the bill... Especially how you get there

I agree, we are after all talking abotu a child murderer here (drones) and thus this would seem to be minor issue. However the PRESSURE if this is true and accepted in society in enormeus because it means that what started as conspiracy cookery turned out to be true and that so many people in the government knew that it was true and so many other people (in the media) behind the scenes knew it was true. So for it depends on how much liers and sophists this brings down and discredits, if it doenst then i agree it matter little, if it does undermine people trust further on the left then i say its huge.

I HIGHLY recommend looking stefans podcasts series on emotions especially "true self false self" podcasts and in regard to rationalization: http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/963/screw-the-rules-part-1 To NOT make philosofy into a bully.

Hey Everyone! After 3 years of thinking about this, ive finally put out a call on thsi forum for fellow Building Entheisiasts be they Architects, Architect students (like me), engineers relating to buildings or building in some way. I would like to connect with those whom i nto onyl share MORAL values but also academic and Career related values! Because as you may already know it is a damn shame and also really depressing if you find philosofy but then find out you have little or nothing else in common with thsoe engaged in rational discourse. If anyone wants to contact me and have friendly chat about philosofy AND career and mutual interests. Well post her first and then we shall see. PS. Other interests include, problems solving, science, chesmistry, food, health, video games, CREATIVITY and Fantasy art/DND. ect. PPS. I can hear my childhood self going like this atm:

1. I am sorry for the horrible experiences of your parents at hands of communists and your own harships as well. 2. As former christian i agree that christianity COMPARED TO WHAT CAME BEFORE had the element of being the first religion that acted more trough GUILT than fear of power (evil religious parents notwithstanding) and that i molded europe from its barbaric roots to more civilized society (Look up Stefans podcasts on christianity s connection to ROMAN LAW and to Greek philosifers, very important this case) 3. Having christanity as bulkwark againt tyranny in your case would no dout downplay its negative qualities for you yes? 4. Many countries that went the way of comminism or socialism were highly religious at the time so i dont see religion itself being preventative of such tyrannies rather merely a competeting form of it thats pushed OUTSIDE of physical reality in the minds of people and thus giving the appearance of being more benevolent. 5. When people lose faith they do not all become socialists or nihilists that we know for sure, so question i pose to you is... why do you think or feel based on your experiences that so many turned to comunism and socialism after lessenign of cristianity? What do you think of the moral power vacuum? (since morality is the greatest power of all i find)

I agree. My point was the to the effect of "lets not rest ease after defending freedom of speech cause peaceful parenting is needed afterwards or people will simply go back to wanting to censor/remove it again."

In the current climate of mostly indoctirnated people and with death of reason entirely with so many others. I dont see making the case for free society/anarcism working on large enough scale and on short enough amounth of time for it to make any differance. As stefan has said there is no time left, if left alone the regressive left and completely cuckservative Repudlicans would have tkaen over what little freedom people had left and destroyed any change freedom had. That goes for europe as well though in here its already much worse. Stefan has many times said and i agree with him that road to free society is multi generational change, that change is impossible under western societys becoming 3rd world ones. Completely backwards approach to parenting and even worse schools. No amounth of rational arguements, small groups of homeschooling or being "correct" would defer at this point in history the demise of the spread of philosofy. IF there was a way to spread peaceful parenting and freedom without tangling up in politics... if i am mistaken about this id gladly be shown otherwise. Also: What is your goal? Because mine is free society and more rationally NOT dead people in this world thus more philosofy (trough peaceful parenting.)

Free speech in society without raising children peacefully and with reason is like ending the state is soviet union in 1991 (amd not just making it less of turning it into another state). Yay more freedoms! Oh no crap totally indocturnated and violance and anti-reason filled society :S

I would prefer stef would go back talking about peaceful parenting , good healthy family relations, spanking, the nostate vs small goverment arguements now that he has so many new eyeballs. That is what i WISH.

Nope. Finland

MYSELF: Age 27 Position: Voluntarist (An-cap) Atheist Net worth: -6000€ - 1700€, possibly simply ? No children, i live alone studying creativity, problems solving and negotiation skills, architecture, physics and technolohy. Currently unemployed, life employment experience roughly 15 months (not uncluding under age 18 working experience.) I am knowledgeable in IT and i have 3 year decree from vocational (pratice and career focused) school. Also work experience is half in IT and half from being a lobbyman/facility maintainance personnel. I have written books and done art in the past, now focus is on architecture and getting back into art (2010 became an atheist and had pretty depressing time). Defoo'ed in 2015 December and currently recovering and changing lifestyle away from harmful gained from childhood of neglect and teens of mystisim (found stefans work in 2013 and called in 2014). I have students debt due to being lied to by the goverment before i met stefan about "right path" to get the educaton i wanted. Some savings and self education currently. Someone i know: Age: 25 Position: Political skeptic, libertarian leaning centrist atheist Net worth: 0-2000€ An Old friend. He has been politically and philosofically very relativist his whole life but in recent years after getting work and education he enjoy has started to engage in debates with me about morality, free market and peaceful parenting. After getting out of his parents house clearly changed to be more receptive for new startling facts, very open to change however perhaps TOO skeptical when it comes to some of the stuff i and stefan speak about. Parents divorced recently and despite this or perhaps because of this is doing really well progressing in his career as programmed and general Computer/Tech entheusiast.

Would it be interesting for people to share their "self identified" stats here? Could add to the bottom list there a bit...

In short: PAST DOESNT EXIIIIIIST! Such pathetic rat mentality :S

The ones that attack, scorn, verbally abuse? Yeah those i would play ny compassion or symphaty card on i agree.

Ummm no, thats not waht this is about at all. I was thinking about strategy of best informing getting to the minds of the truly misinformed. Where did this idea come from? I dont have any "libtard" friends, though even if i did i would call them retards.