Omegahero09

I for one, highly enjoy watching him shred people's comments

What about the show Modern Family? Mitchell and Cameron do stay together throughout the show... but I'd hardly call any of the relationships in that show functional, let alone their marriage.

Yup, weigh your costs and benefits and keep hunting the unicorn. Success is possible, are you willing to work for it?

I always thought it was due to the market opening up, and music becoming more readily consumable to kids/teenagers. The market for appealing to the struggles of the young everyman had value- and it went against the mainstream. Society and the music industry resented the angsty, true-to-self grunge scene. No one understood why or how Nirvana passed Michael Jackson on the charts. People hated the grunge crowd, politicians, priests, everyone. "It doesn't make sense" they would say. I think those themes changed after those 4 years because music genres live and die off. People change and so does their music. I mean look at Maynard of Tool, the music they made was his therapy, and after he healed he had no desire to write more, because he felt he had healed the worst of it.

Thank you for sharing your experience D!

Oh shit man. Well if you are willing to lower your own standards for sex... then there's not much else I can say, other than it is possible to live with the living, and that there are women out there who are willing to keep it shallow, though keeping that kind of person in your camp has it's own dangers. As Stef says- there are no solutions, only costs and benefits. At least you're being honest about being evil but you don't have to commit seppuku with your conscious like that.

I know several woman who are honest and are connected with themselves. I'm sorry to hear that you got muddled in petty nonsense, but you have to understand- they are out there man. Hell, Stef's circle of friends are all pretty much married and with children, so it's possible to do it. Just like talking with other blue-pill people, there's gonna be shitloads of these people out there, and you just have to wade through it, except with blue-pill women you have to guard your heart also. You be up front, you flex your integrity and bold truth and people shy away from your light, and others will band together with you. You are right on the money brotha, communication and practicing RTR is key. It just takes two people mature enough to do it. All you gotta do is be up front right away, put everything on the table because dammit, that's the safest way to go about it, and if she doesn't want to do that- pull the ripcord man lol Also this is I think a disastrous plan. Who would willingly enter a relationship for sex, at the cost of living around/with ghosts?

Provider = Person who brings in money for the children. Not "brings in money and buys dinner and dresses." A provider supports other people in his family unit. I mean, it'd be kinda weird to be with someone, have no kids, and all she does is stay at home so you can "provide" for her. No, the provider role is for long term, monogamous relationships, that with no question includes raising children. A woman who understands this and with self-knowledge, will respect and care about you working within this structure. The woman who doesn't understand this about herself and our species will just use you as you say. Having the ability to be a provider is what makes the panties drop. It's still up to you as a man to bond with a woman worthy of your attention, and resources.

Perhaps this would be an opportunity to tell her how you felt? That you remember what she said and how it made you feel?

Who will speak for those little kids, when their own parents won't speak for them? Be a flare!

http://cdn.media.freedomainradio.com/feed/FDR_242_Reclaiming_Masculinity_Part_1.mp3 http://cdn.media.freedomainradio.com/feed/FDR_243_Reclaiming_Masculinity_Part_2.mp3 Also Utopian, if it helps, here are a couple podcasts where Stef makes a similar case- regarding the nature of sexuality and bonding between the sexes. Hope this helps!

Because of the hopeful pure sounds of synth o.O And also mustachioed machismo

The trade is equal to her because she values your ability to provide. Your emotions don't bring home the bacon. Your skills, intelligence, and agency as a man in society bring home the bacon. To a woman- every man has emotions, but not every man can bring home the bacon. Again to my previous point- the woman without self-knowledge is gonna be like 50 Shades bimbo. The woman with self-knowledge will find a more balanced man. Also this woman will be more open to discussing the exchange you mentioned before: care for care, sex for sex, and value for value. But the problem is- these things mean different things to men and women. Lol but that's a post for another time We're using a broad-ass brush here but more or less, if we were to divide women into two categories that's what we get.

Well certainly man, deviations from the imperative are very common. However when we are talking about those hidden sexual drives that make babies happen- that's just what we are talking about- hidden sexual drives that make babies happen lol A woman may provide for herself, but that doesn't mean that just because she makes money for her home, her brain will change what she is attracted to based on a raise. Well that's the thing. It doesn't make philosophical sense. Because it's just the body reacting to stimuli, and the head following blindly. I mean think about it, traditional monogamous marriage doesn't make sense if you want to act on every boner you get in your life. In the same way that the relationship that bimbo had in 50 Shades didn't make sense for her either.

but... ninja biker gang....

I think I found it...

Hide! Run deep into the wild to avoid detection! Once they pass continue onwards!

Now hold on a moment, Women have been hardwired by their evolutionary biology (the heart of Rollo's excellent broscience) to seek a provider for her children. Which to her, and most of us here on the boards, is our natural, wonderful, biological imperative. This means that she has natural instincts to seek the most stable provider possible. Women are gonna go about that in a couple of ways- the woman who lives without self-knowledge and philosophy will react strongly to her base reaction to typical asshole alpha men- and will pairbond or become invested in some manner to them. The woman who lives with self-knowledge and philosophy will react strongly to her base reaction to typical asshole alpha men but won't pairbond with them. Instead they will seek a man who has in himself balance between full alpha and beta. The lucky philosophical lady who pairbonds with you, will care about your feelings as part of the value exchange for your badassery as a provider; a balanced Man. Bothering about how women won't empathize with you lets you avoid becoming stronger yourself- to avoid entering the market for quality women.

Brain cells... dying...

Must be, rappers aren't supposed to know about universal principles Biggest glitch in the matrix I've ever seen

I mean the man is like, 90% of the way there to full libertarian/anarchist Anybody see this before?

Go for the gold! Surely if they get into trouble, between the magus and the rogue, escape from bondage should be a breeeeeze.

Sooo much circular statist reasoning. C'mon Brand. "Ultimately taking responsibility away from the centralised powers of created government, corporations and alleviating that stress and tension by placing the burden once more on ordinary people." As if the burden wasn't already put on people by proxy according to statist logic? Wat?

Yup. Mj consumption is no different than consuming literally anything else. Soda, cigarettes, cheeseburgers, alcohol, etc. The research is valuable, it just sucks that it's piped through this drivel.

I was a fan of him way back when I was blue pill. He had some entertaining and decent material that imo rivals Kokesh's stuff. He has some great stuff on islam, union corruption, American history, and social programs- to include street interviews, undercover journalism, and comedic presentations. Lately though... it's pretty clear that he's an irrational, unprincipled statist.