GRosado
-
Posts
190 -
Joined
Everything posted by GRosado
-
I don't know, some people have done nefarious intentions I guess.Edit: also how is your situation currently? I'm really hoping it got better.
-
I'm not super familiar with Panarchism so don't take what I say as canon on the subject.To solve that problem I think there would be organizations that have the various governments as members & they would establish certain parameters for dispute resolution & agree upon certain uniform laws throughout the member nations such as: murder is illegal unless in self defense, theft is illegal & so on. However the scenario you presented is highly unlikely that it would break that far.
-
James is the man always coming packed with ammo lol.
-
No I assure you it was a shitty joke from the start, the joke was the contradiction in terms because one is totally against government (Anarcho-Capitalism) & the other allows for government (Panarchism). My jokes are very weak(unfunny) unless you know about history, geography & economics. But you caught the contradiction in terms & I'm assuming by your passive aggressive tone you A) didn't find the joke clever or funny(which I don't blame you for) & B) are writing posts here to get at me for who knows what.As you have done in the past you are putting words in my mouth &/or setting a negative undertone for my posts when the intention wasn't as such, I never said anything about serious discussion nor did I write anything that would give off signals if me demanding a shift towards serious discussion. I simply responded to your statements & to the other poster on the topic. Also no straw man fallacy was committed by me.So if your not going to contribute to a discussion on this topic I would ask that you please stop posting, I don't see value in going tit for tat in a battle of words with you, nor will I continue to. It's just Panarchism vs. Anarchism, capitalism isn't involved much.Well from my understanding DROs are a sort of insurance company to resolve disputes so I don't think they can classify as the same. I'm gonna post that article under the others
-
No the rapist doesn't consult his victim & there is no choice but I don't think that can be applied to government because with rape you have no choice your being aggressed against but in a Panarchist society I assume there would be a choice to live in area without governance or in an area with governance & if you choose to live in an area with governance you would have a choice as to which government you choose.You apply the rape metaphor but that doesn't apply to a system where you have a choice coupled with free movement that only applies to the current system. Im just wondering why you use that metaphor even when it leads to a false conclusion for the current topic, is that not a false analogy fallacy?Edit: Also have you read at least one of the links I provided above besides Wikipedia cause if you haven't you'd be constructing a straw man & trying to disprove it.
-
Should Inheritance be Abolished...?
GRosado replied to super.bueno's topic in Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
Wow this got really nasty really fast, why can't we have a discussion without disparaging insults. Love Peace & Chicken Grease all around -
thank you for your help, Obama
GRosado replied to dsayers's topic in Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
Great video -
Well like I said I wasn't serious about the Panarcho-Capitalist thing, it was a highly clever joke that relied heavily on definitions & my joke sucks but you get the point.But I am wondering how you cannot choose government? You equated it to choosing rape.
-
Ok I'm not an actual Panarchist. My humor is very weak & dry. I guess there's always a tradeoff PPF style: Study |•<- My point | |_____ Comedy @DSayers What fundamentals are you speaking of? @square4 I mean it would be ridiculous not to have a region where there isn't a state within this theory. I don't know much about this so please don't approach me as if I'm the disciple of this political philosophy cause I don't know hence why I asked for the thoughts from everyone. Also this could sort of fit in where you have some areas with governments competing against each other & another area without government that people also have a choice to goto. That would keep them from having there choices limited if they really want a government.
-
I just learned about an interesting political philosophy that was created by Paul Émile de Puydt & as you may have guessed it is called Panarchism. "Panarchism is a political philosophy emphasizing each individual's right to freely join and leave the jurisdiction of any governments they choose, without being forced to move from their current locale." -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchism There is close suggestion to this that was created by a Swiss Economist called Functional Overlapping Competing Jurisdictions (FOCJ) but to me that conception sounds like pre-Thirty Years War Germany honestly. I think this is viable & was wondering what everyone else thought? BTW I will now call myself a Panarcho-Capitalist Edit: It was a joke because they are contradictions of each other, like I have said many times my jokes aren't great. Edit 2: Here are some articles I read on Panarchism that explain it better than the Wikipedia article, please if your going to comment with something regarding it please read a few of these before you do. http://www.panarchy.org/zube/gospel.1986.html http://www.panarchy.org/zube/aphthonius.2005.html http://www.panarchy.org/rozeff/panarchism.html http://www.panarchy.org/knott/principles.html http://www.panarchy.org/debellis/onpanarchy.html
-
Sam Sedar: The Voluntarism Fantasy
GRosado replied to Openeye's topic in Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
Why did the libertarian caller get all fired up & act douchey, relax bro lol. -
I think they should implement an add on to the vote where you have the option of writing why you voted the way you did, so that way the person can build of criticism. Ok well if your goal is to paint me out as illogical, untruthful & christian go ahead I could care less, it's not worth wasting time to go back & forth constantly & I've learned that with a few people on this board.
-
Sam Sedar: The Voluntarism Fantasy
GRosado replied to Openeye's topic in Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
Very excellent & solid points I would just add that statism has existed since before 1500s for as long as government has. -
First paragraph: very trueSecond Paragraph: Not an attack, it was an observation of the landscape & examination of the answers. It sounds like an attack but it is more of a statement of shock at the fact that no one was actually trying to take down this guys argument & also it was an applause of Redford for backing each of his arguments with PROOF/LOGIC & he maintained a respectful demeanor. Also it's clear that you don't know much about the post because you keep talking about religion when religion isn't an integral part of the conversation & I don't understand why you bring it up.Third Paragraph: It's highly inaccurate to say I'm defending religion when I gave a disclaimer that I'm not a Christian so calling my argument illogical because it doesn't fall within the atheist framework is highly disingenuous & saying I'm untruthful is a flat out lie because I maintain academic integrity, everything I wrote about the papacy & stuff like that is historically verifiable. Also by how many times you say logic & truth I feel you don't embody those you simply claim them as your own, what is your endgame with posting here?Fourth Paragraph: Ok so don't attack the people or truth. So if I provide historical facts & you say that it's untruthful & illogical you have just attacked the truth & me. What exactly constitutes a reasonable question might I ask? Is it the question that truly relies on logic & proof or doesn't go against your framework?
-
When I mentioned free speech it was more in regards to the fact that people with a negative reputation are affected & there posts are hidden.Yes I will admit that I get frustrated when someone criticizes me without a just cause or reason. In the threads no one explained why they down voted me. So I don't have a problem with negative criticism just specifically unjustified/uncaused negative criticism.Well when you put it like that it doesn't sound to bad to have a collapsed post lol but I still don't see why that has to happen. Is that a warning for people to steer clear of low rep posters.Like I said earlier I don't write things in the right way (unless it's a DBQ or essay then I kick ass) & that's why I accept some of the down votes I recieved. But I don't feel asking for feedback for those i mentioned above would be fruitful cause I don't know who down voted & those posts are old. Also to be clear I wasn't criticizing the board just the reputation system, I very much fancy the board.
-
No I don't post on YouTube because I don't hold it in as high regards as this site so I expect people on YouTube to down vote obvious truths not people on Freedomain Board. Now that being said I'm not saying all my posts shouldn't be down voted, I clearly said that there are some that I did say stupid stuff that I didn't mean to say the way I did & I so deserve down votes for those. Im not so much complaining about the total negative score as I'm complaining about unnecessary negative votes in some of my posts. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the reputation affect your posts? Someone told me it hid my post from him & that seems stupid.Do you really want me to do that? Im not sure if you can see who down voted but if there is a way to see then I will ask them. But i will definitely keep on doing what I am doing just wondering if the down vote inhibits my posts.
-
That picture went well with your statement & made me laugh. Yes there is free speech at a dinner party but it can be inhibited by the sensitive people at that table. If a guest shits on the table it is obvious enough for everyone to see the shit so no report is needed. Wait hold on what does feces have to do with speech they are two totally different things & seeing as how you disregarded everything else I said it doesn't seem like you commented to contribute anything just to make sardonic remarks.
-
Very interesting reputation point system, I have a -33 reputation which is ridiculous. I have looked through each of the times that I have got a dislike on a post & only 4 or 5 of them are genuine the others are dumb, like I got a dislike for commenting on a post,I said "My goodness he is absolutely blowing you all out of the water & it seems like the big dogs who usually are first to defend atheism have steered clear of this possibly cause of the immense empirical data James Redford has laid down. The ones who stay to defend are simply nitpicking small things about Christianity.".I got a four dislikes for that when it was the truth about the situation. Another example is this"Disclaimer: I am not a Christian or theist but I don't like when people straw man the other side of the spectrum.In a strict sense Technology & Science are different but both are so intertwined that they enable each other to achieve their respective goals.You keep claiming that Christians are the reason innovation has slowed but if you weren't ignorant of history you would realize that it was The Papacy that held back advances which was a government body controlled by Christians who were hardly such simply research the Borgia popes & their successors (maybe Pope Julius). Your over generalizing & demonizing a whole demographic without actually providing the historical facts.The papacy wasn't anti science per se they just viewed scientific advances as challenging their authority over the people's worldview & secular power.Science hasn't completely disproved the possibility of a Deity it has only disproven the Christian concept of a deity. If you want to find some interesting arguments read & watch Dr. Gerald Schroeder an Israeli physicist.I won't disagree with you on that many Christians do flip flop on issues but I feel it is due to the people in charge of their doctrine who manipulate the bible to their benefit. One thing that I criticize Christians & theists for is their strong belief in personal intervention even though it frequently fails."That got a few dislikes.How are these false statements that deserve dislikes?This system is based on peoples opinion without any justification so basically if they don't agree with what you said even if it was a fact they could just damage your reputation by down voting you.There are some other posts that I have made that I know deserve a down vote but the many others don't deserve it.So is there really Free speech on this forum or does the majority decide what you say is false & that's how it goes? The reputation system is weird & disingenuous.
-
That's strange I don't see the votes cause I'm on mobile, why would someone down vote what I commented.
-
God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics
GRosado replied to JamesRedford's topic in Atheism and Religion
That is a Argument from incredulity -
Actually forget my previous statement the freest nation in the western hemisphere is actually the Netherlands. That's according to the data gathered by the Cato & Fraser institutes.
-
Prescriptions for ADHD drugs double among adults
GRosado replied to Alan C.'s topic in Current Events
Wow very interesting, another thing that is a little related to this is Sigmund Freud Psychoanalysis, his theories are making a comeback & they can accurately explain many of the health problems people have these days. -
Wait these are criticisms of Socialism in general but is there any criticisms of the Communist Manifesto in particular
-
Lmao you accomplished what I couldn't within a matter of minutes.Ok then I will scrap my planned critique.
-
I've looked around the internet for a solid critique of the 'Communist Manifesto' from a Laissez Faire position but have not found any (interestingly enough I found communist critiques if the book). So I have decided to write a page by page critique of the communist manifesto in the vain of Hazlitt's 'Failure of New Economics'. I'm about a quarter of the way through but I'm not sure where I could post the entire critique. If anyone knows of a good place to post it please reply to this. "There is a specter haunting America, it if the specter of AnarchoCapitalism" -Me