Wuzzums

I don't understand the point of this post. a) you just repeated what Stefan said in his recent video b) nobody here is pro-spanking

Nope. The call-in shows are the essence of FDR and there's not anything like it elsewhere. Most other podcasts of the like pick a topic then pic people to talk about it. Stefan picks people then the people pick what they want to talk about. Stefan tries to understand the person before addressing their question which in most cases leads to common ground. I haven't seen anyone else do this in a podcast or in real life. This is what's unique about FDR.

Women like confidence. You said you wanted to send a letter because you lack confidence. For the love of god and all that is holy, don't send her a letter unless you wanna eliminate any chance you might have with this woman.

Win.

A woman that wants to settle down won't go for someone that's on the move. There's always the risk of the prospect suddenly leaving, and women do not like risk. About the woman that you said doesn't want to get married. She can change her mind. It's not set in stone that she has to get married and immediately start having kids. I have never met a woman that said they didn't want to get married and have kids. It's always "I don't want to get married and have kids at this moment in time". Another alternative could be she's waiting to see if a better mark will come along. Did you ask her if that's the case?

Have you seen the movie "Hail, Caesar!" ? The Coen brothers are probably one of my favorite directors of all time and I strongly recommend every movie they ever made. In this movie they offer a glimpse into the inside workings of Hollywood (or at the very least how things used to be). Long story short, movie stars are movie stars. That's their job. Acting is part of their job but being an actor is not their job, if that makes any sense. They are always under a contract and that contract stipulates among other things how much media attention they will get and how they should promote the movie AND behave. Point I'm trying to make is that the persona of the actor we see on screen is just another character. Whether it's a moral or immoral character should matter as much as how moral or immoral the guy holding the camera is in their personal life. People love drama and drama sells more tickets. Check out MMA. Who fights who is not exactly decided on a hierarchical level, it's decided based on hype. Skill is necessary but not sufficient. Harrison Ford was never a nice guy. When George Lucas first met him he said he was the most unlikeable person he's ever seen (Ford was there to paint his house btw). That didn't change. Hollywood just spun a tale about how he's not who he really is in order to sell more tickets. I myself was very heartbroken when I found out Chris Evans was an absolute cuck but I'm not paying to see Chris Evans. I'm paying to see Captain America. That said I have no idea how I would act if he were to have sex with a drugged out 19 year old. However keep in mind that acts like these back then were to be expected and rarely frowned upon. It's the whole should we judge the past by the standards of today conundrum.

Stefan Molyneux MKUltra George Soros shill confirmed !

I know what you mean about dating. Judging by the couples I know there's a sweetspot for success. The successful couples usually begin dating in their early twenties and go to the same university (meaning they'll have the same career path). Sometimes they begin dating from highschool but if they choose different career paths it will most likely result in a dismissal of the relationship. Quality people with whom you can start a family with disappear after the mid twenties because they'll most likely get scooped up by someone else because the demand is so high. I'm 27 and the women of worth that have caught my attention within the same age bracket or older all were very, very married. So younger is the way to go if you want to get a shot.

MGTOW is not a solution, it is a symptom. We need to have less empathy for and pay less attention to whores. The more we subsidize something the more of that something we're gonna get.

But this was a conversation about ideas. None of us are emotionally invested in it and none of us have ongoing relationships depending on it.

You actually think people would spend the time to go over someone else's walls of text because they're so engaging and the arguments put fort are so enlightening? When 2 strangers talk through text it's either to reinforce their preconvictions or to virtue signal. You can no more communicate with someone effectively over text than you can listen to music by looking at sheet music. I'm not saying it can't be done, but humans haven't evolved to talk through text.

As in how we can create AI and how human-level AI can be achieved.

Book recommendation: Jeff Hawkins - On Intelligence It explains how the brain works, the difference between conscience and intelligence and why we'll NEVER create human level AI because creating human level AI literally requires creating a human. The movie Ex-Machina also got it right. The guy didn't create AI, he created an artificial person with the same needs and limitations of a normal human. We cracked the AI problem decades ago and we've been using AI in our day to day lives ever since (firewalls, auto-correct, video-games, etc). Dominance over a group is a distinctively human trait therefore to say that a computer would develop human characteristics is just LOTR style fantasy.

This is a rehash of a decade long video:

If South Park has ever taught me anything is that I should beware the cum and joke mines of Mars.

Stefan has explained on many occasions FDR is not for everyone and is not a sure way to happiness. Philosophy is not a vaccine or the like, it's chemotherapy. There's a good chance it's gonna kill off the cancer but there' also an equally good chance it's gonna kill you off sooner.

They ARE going to overthrow this election. The MSM predicted a 98% chance of this happening.

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/free-bleeding

Everything that raises your sexual market value should make you feel good because just like sex the end result is a higher chance of spreading your genes.

Recently I have looked into US mandatory vaccination and my own country's (Romania) mandatory vaccination. There's basically no real difference. In Romania however the instances of autism/ADHD or whatever allergies have not increased. Peanut butter in the US is a common food which all kids are exposed to perhaps consumed even daily. In Romania nobody has a taste for it and we occasionally consume peanuts. In Romania basically psychology is not formally recognized meaning psychologists cannot diagnose anyone or prescribe medication. If a child gets diagnosed with ADHD by a psychologist they need to go to a psychiatrist in order to get tested, rediagnosed and get the desired medicine. Psychiatrists usually deal with severe cases, patients that are institutionalized for life because their mental illness is a danger to themselves or others. When a kid walks in with some behavior problems like ADHD they'll just shrug it off much like an epidemiologist shrugs off seasonal flu. I have a friend who works with autistic children, he told me a lot of people that call themselves autistic from YouTube vids are not. Furthermore there is not a "high functioning autistic child" type of concept in our culture. We just call those people "weird". So in conclusion peanut allergies and the like might be a result of exposure to the allergen and the high incidence of mental disorder might be due to impulsive diagnosis. I'm curious, do you know what the vaccines your child takes inoculate against?

No proof of life since the last leak. http://wearechange.org/internet-frenzy-assange-dead/

Have you guys been following up on 4chan's investigation into the government for pedophilia? This guy does a pretty decent job on chronicling the data so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi6ryNOg8z0 The evidence is absolutely insane. Over the past year there have been several credible sources on 4chan and other anonymous image boards that have given sensitive information to bring down the Clintons. From warnings about the Trump-tape (even before its release) to advice to suggestions to investigate the Clinton-Foundation over anything else. However there have been several warning regarding this particular rabbit-hole implying it goes really deep implicating powerful foreign state officials. Assange is more than likely dead and with his assassination one has to wonder if we're not on the brink of a world-wide crisis if those in power are getting so desperate to resort to such drastic means.

As Constantinople burned intellectuals were arguing over he gender of angels. What you are witnessing is a well know socialist tactic. It's detailed in Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals": always hold your opponent accountable to their own principles. Anarchists/libertarians have the moral argument on their side, there should be no stopping them... unless you make them too scared to act lest they violate the NAP. Never ever forget: THE NAP DOES NOT APPLY TO COMMUNISTS/SOCIALISTS.