Boss

I believe it comes down to if you believe Homosexuality and Pedophilia are choices.

Will this app need back end development? If not, feel free to PM me your skype

Its normal for the government to recommend this. Here is the USA one https://emergency.cdc.gov/preparedness/kit/disasters/ Let me take a guess, the government and mainstream media is trying to cause more civil unrest between the Germans and "refugees" to get more attacks and bring in some government policy. It seems in the comments the Germans are already hostile towards the "refugees". alright, ima just take off my tin foil hat and keep an eye on this story. I will however, pray for peace.

I would get some silver and bitcoin. Maybe a little gold if you can afford it. Guns, car with gas, water filter and food are essential imo Study recent "collapsed" areas to get a better idea of what may happen like Venezuela and Zimbabwe,

Hello, I have years of experience with wordpress, I am not sure if you still need this but I sent you a PM.

Everything from height, hand size, feet size are on average bigger on a male body. Muscle/joint size and growth is different. Even the male brain is different. Thinking a male who went through HRT doesnt have an advantage over a woman is absurd. Salon.com is a pedophile enabler and defender. They are imo the worst leftest website. Jesus save us

Lol the two tweets were hilarious. I think Stefan was on fox another time as well but they snipped his video instead of his tweet.

watch the first few minutes, he said something about putting out everything as a "labor of love" which I found interesting. After some research it turns out nutritionfacts.org was started with funds from an environmental organization. And after that I pretty much knew where he was headed. He bashes fish, meat and pretty much all animal products which is ridiculous considering the essential brain nutrients like DHA, creatine, b12 etc. If we are talking diets then the Ketogenic diet is the only diet I know of that is widely accepted for treatment and that is mainly for epilepsy. The idea of a plant based diet will prevent heart attack or cancers is not proven. If you want to lower your risk of cancer then just be aware of known causes like smoking, eating proceed meats/veggies, sunlight.

Yea I do believe steroids get a bad rep due to professional sports banning them but I would only use it if needed. Even you mention some of the factors "It's quite a life changing therapy, but one not for the feint of heart, as it involves a variety of considerations such as: weekly, if not bi weekly injections (if done correctly), along with other medications (anti estrogen, hcg - which helps with weigh and testicle shrinkage). " From my research and experience of talking to people who gone through with it, There are many risk involved but if planned and monitored I am sure it can be safe. If your doctor recommends it and can monitor your situation, I see no issue going with it. I personally would try natural methods like changing diet, exercising and getting enough sleep before going through with it. I wish you luck on this, if possible let us know how it goes

The person who claimed to found it said he has "no proof" Surprised this made the news

This test seems to be the best one I used. http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest=3108 It should give different results from the other simpler IQ tests. Feel free to report back The thing with online IQ tests is you must take them once without any help from google or anywhere

When looking at Hillary and Bernie social media accounts, I seen them filled with Spanish content. Its clear they are trying to get the immigrant vote and considering there may be 20 million ILLEGAL immigrants that can vote without ID, this is a serious problem.

I love Hawaii! I visit multiple times a year. It is pretty much a socialist state. There seems to be tension about the US government take over of Hawaii via gunpoint. Its kinda like the tension of past slavery in the mainland. The best way to turn the tide is talk about the government and how they are responsible. The University of Hawaii actually has a paper about the death by government "Democide". The government killed over 260,000,000 people. https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

Feminism is only and specifically the idea that is for equal rights for woman, it has no intellectual or philosophical content that would lead one to anything else So lets not talk about the tall Asian, the majority of people are either more liberal or conservative. Only 10% of atheist are conservative and want smaller government. Atheist are majority liberal. At this state if the majority of people were atheist then we got ourselves a liberal government. Am I more worried about people telling people after they die God will judge them into heaven or hell or am I more worried about what the majority of athiests want more of, The government actually locking you up in a cage where you can get raped repeatedly? Then you dont go over the fact atheist have less kids so are less invested in the future. You can probably go over it when you call in?

The brick holding drug legalization is the state being able to charge fines, lock people up and make money. That article you listed doesnt even have sources

So you think because the mother is not "separated" from the baby, she can kill the baby. But I believe OP point was the conjoined twins are not separated and you wouldn't agree one of the twins can kill the other just because its not "separated" As far as you saying it has to be a human being, I am not sure if you understand what a human being is. The human being is formed once fertilization is completed. Princeton University has a great article on its website explaining the facts https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html Me personally I see abortion immoral 1. We were all once alive in the mother and being in that state or any other state(coma/vegetative) does not give anyone the right to murder 2. I wouldnt want my life ended for the reasons mothers get abortions 3. 99% of the time the mother willingly did the activity that put her in the situation so I dont believe she is the victim. I believe the baby is.

Even if you see it as a form of mental abuse(I dont) then why stay? Only hostages or mentally unstable people stay with an abusive(mentally) partner

It probably means if you are not confrontational "rodents" will overtake your space. Sure it might start off small like you just not wanting to "kill the mood" just like how it started off with 1 mice, its not a big deal right? But just like your dream more and more "rodents" kept pouring in. And in the end, it left you exasperated. Personally tho I wouldnt give it a second thought as I am not one into thinking of meanings for dreams. I am not sure about the science of dreams and how adding meaning to it can help. Maybe if it is a reoccurring nightmares and you want it to stop, doing that could help. Or are you thinking finding meaning can help you in the real world? I am definitely into the science of dreaming and I like hearing what people dream about in general. Thanks for the post.

If you didnt get what I meant I probably shouldnt even be responding. Obviously I am referring to the life in the womb every non-suicidal human benefited from the mother not choosing murder.

When the woman involved herself in an action that involves another life. Ending that life is immoral. As far as medical complications which are less than 1% of abortion, the intention would be to save both lives. If the baby dies it wouldnt have been murder thus not immoral. We will just have to disagree. I dont see murder justifiable just because "its her body" especially when her body took action that now involves another life.

You could say a 1 year old baby has no capacity for growth on its own as well. It will need the mothers milk or someone to feed it. A 1 y/o cant just grow up on its own. You keep saying the woman owns her own body but she is the one who did an activity that created another life. I believe ending life because of your own faults is immoral

Life: the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. Yes, I am not saying stress the woman out. Like I said in the beginning you cant force the woman. I am saying If you had a baby and someone killed it in the womb most people would consider them immoral. But I guess if it happened to be the mother who killed the baby, you wouldnt.

Under the definition of life the woman is holding life. I dont think that part is debatable. Its living matter. Obviously he woman owns her body and she decided to take part in an activity that now involves 2 another lives. The man who helped create life and the life inside the woman. Ending the life of the mans future child would be immoral. Why wouldnt it be? If you wanted a child and your wife was pregnant and someone punched her belly till the life inside her end, would you consider that person a murderer? I would and so do most states law.

You think the life inside the woman created by both parties has no right? And the man has no right to say he wants the child? Obviously you cant force the woman but if she ends the life when the man wanted it I would consider her immoral. Both are responsible for creating life. Both know the possible outcome of sex.

Unless there was an agreement beforehand, I would say if either party wants the life of their future child, stopping that life would be immoral.