Yeravos

Hey fellas! Just wanted let you guys know that Steven Franssen is doing fantastic livestreams @ https://www.youtube.com/user/RedRightHunter/featured Steven talks about current events, eviscerates leftism and purges the cuck out of those who watches his streams and reads his books! We have a lot of fun over here, why don't you join us?

An article I wrote on doing hard work and reaping the benefits! https://selfknowledgedaily.com/reaping-the-fruits-of-hard-work-698866ed2faf#.j4flxhws2

Having looked up the term online, if it roughly means an ethnic group of people adhering to the traditional ways and customs of their ancestors honoring them accordingly then I would say yes. MYFAROG's world Thulê is heavily inspired by european deities and customs with a focus on scandinavia. The creator states that the world of Thulê is very true to how our Iron Age was in europe.

Hello mgggb! The sessions themselves would be between 2-3 hours each time we'd play. Creating a character can take a long time although I could roll up characters for those willing to play and basically tell them what the personality of the character they'd roleplay is like, and the player would then make do with that. It would also make playing more enjoyable and easier if the players familiarize themselves with some of the setting beforehand. TL:DR 2-3 hours with actual gameplay, time set aside for creating a character (an hourish) from the bottom up and time to familiarize oneself with the setting as to have more tools for better roleplaying.

Hello FDR peeps! I'd like to start running tabletop RPG gaming sessions over skype or some other voice chat. The game I'd like to run is MYFAROG (Mythical Fantasy RolePlaying Game). I have one player as of now and would like two more to get things going You do not have to have any previous experience from tabletops to join. My timezone is central european and we'll play in the day/evening. Interested? Comment! Have a question, comment and I'll answer to the best of my ability

About 2 years ago, the twelfth of October 2014, I published my first non-fiction book on self-knowledge and self-therapy through keeping a journal. The response was incredible. I could never have imagined that I could move people in the way the told me I had moved them. It has been a humbling experience, knowing that I had had such an impact on people. I was given help with editing by several people, and one of those people was Steven Franssen, a fellow author and an INCREDIBLE human being. You can find his work on his YouTube-channel https://www.youtube.com/user/RedRightHunterand on his website http://www.nurturingtruth.com/ Now, Steven has made and published my e-book, as an audiobook on audible, with him as the narrator! You can find the audiobook version @ http://adbl.co/2dx7fgi You can also find the e-book version on https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/484220(free) If you find it valuable, then you can buy it on http://amzn.to/2dvczltto support me in writing more If you feel you got value out of it, but cannot afford to buy it, you can also leave a review on smashwords, amazon and audible. Of course, you can do both aswell And! If you want to support me AND FDR at the same time, use an FDR affiliate link and search for my book (search for ''Dear Self Erik Lugnet'') The affiliate link... for Americans: http://www.fdrurl.com/Amazon for Canadians: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada for the UK and europeans: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK Thank you for your time, and I wish you a wonderful day! Erik Lugnet

Did the sifter one. Your scored 18 correct (out of a possible 33). This implies an IQ of approximately 129 on the European/Cattell scale (stdev 24), or about 119 on the Stanford-Binet/USA scale (stdev 16).

Innocents are already attacked. The people having to pay for the immigrants and their children are being taxed. Of course all immigrants are not criminals. They are more likely to commit crime however. Open borders in a welfare state, is not the same as open borders in a free voluntary society. How is this relevant?

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and passion Matthew. I was moved by your response. More people like you are needed in this world.

Hi Janne, I am doing very well. I hope you are doing well too. To your first question, I'd say I layed out in the beginning as to why I think I was scared to talk about it. But also, I think I was being scared of triggering an inner critic, telling me that indeed, Stefan is abandoning principles, is racist, and that I also am going that way by ''defending'' Stefan. I am not as scared now, I instead feel more assured that I am holding a logical and well argued position after I posted my thoughts on it. On your second question, I believe that at least some of the people in FDR that do not agree with the arguments and conclusions Stefan has laid out about the issue. I thought perhaps me laying it out in a short summery kind of way might have it ''click'' for some of those people. Of course, I'd also like counterarguments of course, since they would perhaps show errors in my reasoning, or extra information that I might have missed. I'd like to be right, and not talk about things that are not true. While the support is nice, it is not what I want with the post. What I want from my post is either have valid counterarguments laid out, or, have people either undecided or on ''the other side'' of the issue, see the arguments and logic as valid. So that they in turn can start to bring this up with other people. The intention of giving out this information (ofc I can't speak for the reasons Stefan has, but I believe they are similar at least) is that it conveys urgency. Because if what I am arguing is true, then we need to start to act against what is happening in Europe. I know that at least for me, understanding the arguments and reasoning, is pushing me to start to gather courage to talk about these things. Because we really, really need to at least talk about these issues. I hope I have answered your questions adequately, if not please let me know and I'll be happy to try again Have a good one Janne

I am not entirely sure how to start what I want to convey to you guys. I find it to be a difficult topic. Because from what I have seen, tends to bring out a lot of bad qualities in people. Also, it is difficult because there are so many factors involved. IQ, race, economics, philosophy, society, culture, religion etc etc etc... Speaking about this scares me. It scares me, because I don't want to be called names. I don't want to fight with people I have considered to be brothers and sisters in philosophy. But alas, I communicate this, because what scares me the most, is the consequences of not talking about it. There is a divide in the freedom community. In the FDR community. Most of us know this. The issue of immigration and borders. For some time now, Stefan has been under fire from people who will say things like ''Stefan has abandoned principles'', ''Stefan is a statist'', ''Stefan is a racist'', ''Stefan has gone crazy''. I will dedicate another post to what I feel about all these allegations towards Stefan. With this post, I want to help people understand where at least I come from on this issue, which I think mirrors Stefans stand on it quite well. This will be a short explanation of how I have come to the conclusion that immigration and border control is an extremely important topic for us who want a free society. There is a lot more that could be added, but I believe what follows will give sufficiant reason for people to see the immigration from the middle east to the west as on of the biggest threats to our cause, a free peaceful society. Of course, by all means, correct me wherever I go astray if I do. Deep breath, let's begin. Open borders in a welfare society is a government program. It is about importing people, who are more likely than the domestic population to vote for a larger government. And why wouldn't they really, it is big government (i.e welfare state) that puts food on their tables. It is also big government that will make sure that immigrants already in the country will have family, friends or just people of the same religion (islam) to also immigrate to that country, who will also end up in general voting for bigger government. Where does the welfare money come from? It comes from, in general, the people native to the country. People who are more likely to vote for smaller government and less welfare. These people work, and then have their money taken away from them, that is then given to people who do not work, and who will vote for more welfare, more government. This is already problematic with the people just coming in. But what makes it worse, is that they don't just come over and live off the stolen productive labor of the natives... They have children. Children, that will grow up in households, dependant on welfare. What will those children one day vote for do you think? And what makes it EVEN WORSE... Is that these immigrants, not only have children... They have MANY more children than the native people paying for them to have children! I have hesitated to use this word before, but I believe it is approriate. It is genocide. Silent genocide. Take money from a group of people, who will be less likely to have children because of diminished resources, and give that money to another group of people who have done nothing to earn that money, who will then be able to have more children because of an increase in resources. That is genocide. At the point of a gun forcing a group of people to support another group of people having children, at their own repoductive expense. But wait, there is more. These people, already burdening the native population with their own welfare dependancy and the future welfare dependancy of their children, are also much more likely to commit violent crimes against the native population! Not only is it letting in people, it is letting in more violent people. Letting in people more likely to rape and murder. Importing crime. What does this all boil down to? This is the FDR community. And most of us accept, that the road to a peaceful society, is through the peaceful parenting of children. It's the ONLY way. And the migrant crisis, is threatening to set us back in the work that has been done so far. Letting in these immigrants is going to put children at a higher risk of violence. Of trauma. It is going to put their parents at a higher risk of trauma. It is going to result in children having to be around more of these, in general more violent immigrant children in schools, at playgrounds. The immigrant children will do worse in school, because of their lower IQ, and white people will be blamed, further traumatizing the children. And of course, the people paying for the immigrants to have children, will themselves have fewer children. More violent parents breeding, less peaceful parents breeding. Do you think it is difficult convincing society today of peaceful parenting? Well, it is only going to get worse when we import people with cultural backgrounds that treat their children even worse. Female genital mutilation. Wife beating. Stoning. A higher rate of male circumcision. It is not only about defense (which I believe is justified) when it comes to talking about restricting borders in a statist society. But it is also about saving the future. Making sure we have time to educate people on peaceful parenting. Because if this is not done... then our children will have no future worthy of living in. There is much more to this, but I feel confident that I have made a solid case for the position I hold. That supporting open borders in a statist welfare society, is not fighting for freedom, for a free society. It is working against a free society. It is being an acomplice in the destruction of the most peaceful civilization the world has ever seen. It is dooming our children to lives in slavery.

Like the idea! I'd definitely be up for it!

Yeah that's how it went down. I also caught that, that I had already told her. I think the reason I didn't ask her what she meant by hobbies is because at that point, I, had lost interest and just felt like writing something that was a bit different. Perhaps unsescessary if I was not interested anymore, but it was entertaining Yup, I am glad that it didn't consume much of my time at all, just a few sentences exchanged. I uninstalled tinder after that. Have you moved to another app SuperAdventurer, or have you abandoned/paused the online dating? Yeah I find it fascinating when people write things like that on their profile and expect people to respond positively to it. Then again, I am sure some do, which is sad. I am really starting to understand what Stef talks about when he says ''be honest'', ''be yourself'' when it comes to dating. Makes the filtering process so much more effective. I took the obligatory sigh of relief when I too realised that I had yet again dodged a bullet

Thank you for your feedback Rachelle, I appriciate it! Glad you liked it

I had a lot of fun talking and thinking about this. Hobbies! What are they for? What are they even? Can you have hobbies when the world is on fire? Also, being crazy about your passions! Let me know what you think Video is improvised, none-scripted and kind of crazy. You have been warned!

I had a lot of fun talking and thinking about this. Hobbies! What are they for? What are they even? Can you have hobbies when the world is on fire? Also, being crazy about your passions! Let me know what you think

Thank you Kathryn, glad you liked it!

Hello Zelenn! Just wanted to let you know that every Saturday, there is a google + hangout called ''Philosophy Euro Call''. It is targeted mostly towards europeans, but anyone is welcome to join. On the hangout we talk about philosphy, economics, statism, personal issues, self-knowledge you name it! Every saturday 20.00 CEST https://plus.google.com/communities/105784012586757265988 Have a good one!

Really interesting, I was just thinking myself today what it would be like to play games with people from FDR (I guess that is what you meant?). What games are you thinking of Irwin?

Welcome man, glad you found us!

If you are interested in clarifying the NVC approach, I think you'd reach more people if you called in and had a conversation with Stef.

Thank you for your challenging and thoughtprovoking questions, Matt D and TechnicallyLibertarian! I will have to think over these carefully

Hello FDR! I'd like to get some feedback on a project I am pursuing at the moment I am in the process of writing a book on the Mecosystem(if you have not heard of the term before, it is a word that as far as I know Stefan coined, it is basically Internal Family System http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Family_Systems_Model). I want to basically introduce the concept of Mecosystems and give the basics of how one can work with ones Mecosystem, inspired by both Stef's podcasts on it, IFS theory, and how I have worked with it. My question to you guys is, if you were (or still are) new to the concept of you not having one personality, but actually several, what kind of questions would you ask of the person proposing this theory? Have a good day folks

I feel this conversation that Scott and Stef had might well be one of the most important, gamechanging conversations I have ever heard. Not only the fact that there are, when I think about it, a lot of things I have in common with what I imagine would be a whole lot of christians out there even though I am an atheist (something I would never think I'd ever say), but it is also giving me food for thought when it comes to ''How can I improve the world?'' For quite some time, I have thought that the best way I can change the world is for me to act and speak as if we were on the brink of a peaceful society. Which I don't think we are. To just bullrush into the superstitions of people and cry ''For truth!''. It is a difficult thing to say, because I identify a great deal with that inner radical social-change warrior inside me... But it is too soon. I believe that I, like Stef, has been projecting my own situation onto the rest of the world. Truth was (relatively) easy for me to grasp... because I had so little to lose, and so much to gain. But that isn't the case with everyone else. This call has helped me realise, that truth isn't worth much, if it cannot change the world. It helped me realise that I do not want to fight for truth, but for the children. That fighting for truth might help children out is more of a happy coincidence. I have a lot more thoughts to digest from this call... I expect to relisten to it a few more times at least. A HUGE shoutout to the brave caller Scott. What a brave and good man, changing the world for real. And of course, thanks once again Stef for sharing wisdom and love to the world.

Thank you, I really appriciate it!