Anuojat

I think we can agree that state meddling in this affair (along with the welfare) has caused the most problems over this issue. Because if it was left up for the free market abortion would become much more delegated to issues of life threatenign circumstances. And this massive tide of abortation we have today would have a financial cost along with the social ostracism. Not neccerily JUST the issue about human/fetus dichotomy but why would anyone associate with a woman who gets herself banged here and there and when careful consideration, time and birth control condoms ectectect. were ALL available? Being irresponceable or lazy or dumb about sex would quickly have a very steep cost.

As an asperger myself i can only say that in my experience it has been more than jsut being rational person in irrational world- ...however this fact does significantly amplify it because as asperger i perceive intellectual topics more clearly and abstract topics i have, lets jsut say easier time getting into than understanding someones feelings. Jokes, subtle sighs of emotions and feelings from another persona was hard to perceive then and now but it has becomes easier after gaining lot of self knowledge friends from FDR and also applying RTR in my own life along with changing the other people around me. So i think Aspergers is very real however you can alleaviate its potentially negative side effects with rational company and practice and friends.

Id like to just commend you for being honest and having the integrety to come out about your situation and your feelings on the matter. Besides trying to get job somewhere else similiar or that fits your like and interests... jsut kudos and massively happy to hear you could escape the mental grinder of having to face the reality of your situation.

The relative darkness of humanitys past is my hope. And my own actions againts ANY tide of irrationality is to support this show, ostracice people in my life and make the case and arguements clear. Namely the againts me and economic and moral arguements. Also not wasting my time supporting a debate that doesnt deserve attention.

I think if someone works in such agency theyre heavily invested emotionally and financially to the point that you talking like this makes them think YOU are the problem (as evident by what happened.) Which means that either: A. They really believe what they do is good and are supriced and shocked at your words. B. Thye have grown lofty and arrogant for trying to find somethign on you, both thinking what they do is necceriry and jsut AND contradicnarily thinking you should obey such "good" people and not make a scene. And so they want to punish you for being a troublemaker and a bad person and indeed as you said set an example. To me they sounded like bad parents whom tell everyone ESPECIALLY themselves that they love theyre children but dont.

I currectly CAREFULLY am consider if my hobby'es are useful or not. I find that useful or pragmatic hobbies are almost like more relaxed part time job that you LOVE to do

Same old shit. People respond to incentives and want violance to be used if it aids them in the process. Or to put it another way: "My busness is in danger of goign under because you provide better service. Stop being nice to my girlfriend she is thinking of leaving me."

Oh thank Geezus, maybe i overreacted thinking you were taking them seriously. PS. *looks at links* yeeeeeah, hindsight about not understanding a joke/spoof is a pain :S

A blog paper (not scientifically peer rewied one) about 1 type of vaccine from 5 states next to another hardly counts as evidence of ALL vaccines not curing anything. Certainly there were polio vaccine induced problem following salks first vaccine (polio vaccine induced polio) was a problem and has been concern. However as miller in the paper mentions this is mostly an issue with people with compromised immune systems (the effect being 7000 fold increase in the changes.) As much as i distrust the government i cannot just take a paper like this and "be all i need to know." Naturalnews.com is one of the worst pseudoscience and misinformation site there is. I cant in good consicience let this fly by, numerious people have already pointed out the various quakeries that this site promotes and adventeries and at some point even if one doesnt have to debund everything. Its not worth pursuing because lies can be made faster than debunking them after all. Some denking and exposers to the sites other promotations: http://skeptoid.com/blog/2013/11/08/naturalnonsensenaturalnews-hyperbole-on-cancer-screening/ http://health.skepticproject.com/articles/natural-news/what-skeptics-really-believe/ http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/who-do-you-know-who-believes-in-the-most-deadly-kind-of-pseudoscience I would also point out that naturalnews that referances as its own sources ITSELF on ore accounts than it sources actual scientific papers (papers that have been reproduced or rewiew OR which actually say waht they claim they say.) As such my main ciritism and concern is this: We here at FDR should and i think do follow reason evidence and logic and as such a site like this while containing some good advice (on herbs and few food items) and few articles refering to actual scientific papers i dont think if one wants to be philosofical and follow reason and evidence and logic should grant such a site any creditability. I hope this has been useful and should you feel or see if ive made some mistakes in my quest to debunk this sites creditability id be happy to respond.

If people arent free its not a free market. Slavery is anti freedom (and immoral and irrational in its possible "justifications"). The market is not perfectly free if there are slaves. Same with people and governments PS. Also i am very curious why this interests you.

Me thinks Stefan HAS mentioned that several time already and made several podcasts about it. Are you thinking of new ones? PS. Also by west you mean the governments. Not the people as a whole right?

Id suggest investing in hard assets: - Bitcoin - Gold/Silver - Maybe commodeties? (see stephans interwiww with that one investor guy here: )- Your own skills at various useful valueable and useable skills - Relationships with with friend and philosofically-rationally minded folk - Your body, physical activity and diet. And most importantly! Investment in these regardless of economic downturn is important!

Well if you search for "love it or leave it' from Stefans podcasts and videos on youtube youll pretty much find i think very good counter arguements. As for addions to that which he has already said i agree with, theres ofcourse the fact that you CANNOT leave in many cases because the state economically bars you from leaving and forces other hurdles on to you if you decide to do so. Also to say that you MUST love it or leave implies that the sate OWNS everything and that the voters and politicians (whom randomly fluctuate in numbers and persons) also own everything because people vote for those in power. So the "arguement" fails on that fron entirely. The assumption is that the people in the government have any rationally justified authority in the first place, which they dont. The people saying these words to you are just bylluing you to shut up and obey the rules which THEY prefer and are automatically rejecting your principles and preferances AND not only that but ignoring the fact that you arent imposing anyhting on them but they are on you. The "againts me" arguement comes to mind in such an instance. Though its very volite remember that.

There is a sadness that follows anger towards a person in me atleast I may still feel angry when i remember what was done to me but no longer as angry and also because ive been sad ive been able to let go off the person. Sadness podcast is where i got this from an felt it was right and then applied to my own actions.

IVe been helped and ive helped in the past... so i could help. But i understand can symphatice with your fear and anxiety to just ask.

Excuse me? Are you allright?

This sounds important enough to perhaps call in and scedsuale a show! Stef and Mike have many a time had couples on the show in the calls discussing JUST this sort of thing! Also have you sough (good) therephists for each other?

From finland aswell Welcome. Tereeve tulloapi. PS. If you didnt guessed my father was from SAvo...

' I couldnt find the scuentific papers from the link you posted. Any idea where they could be Alan? I dont have disagreement with the picture sources seem legit (although american heart association seem to indicate the moderate drinking had no significant effect, only the daily drinking had) But about aspertime... and other sweetners. Any scientific papers on those? Since ive only seen acesylftime-k being dubious in term and health effects and other being fine as far as the research goes.

Sounds to me like good old puritan/christian ostrcism and shaming of certain people who DONT do something instead of doing something

Welcome to the boards! FYI, councidentally i got a friend from wales! PS. RTR is one hell of a book... for life yet untested or unexamined.

It is amazing to the decree people will go to cry foul against progress if its hurts theyre short term interests. And its equally asthunishing how government prevent competation by regulation then competation comes along and tries to provide better service and is attacked. I am concerned that the next thing people/politicians will say is "cabals and monopolies are good for the people if its government granted." The french situation almsot seems like people are demanding no competation and less choice to keep up the status quo. Am i wrong here? Is it jsut minority of people here? Do majority in the france and US like uber?

Lets go looking for SIN under the chairs! I am sure well find something wrong or offensive SOMEWHERE if we keep looking logn enough! Whole heap of crazy looking for somethign that doesnt exist. Very religious in that granting somethings existance FIRST in ones head and thens ets out to look for it. Just replace creationist with feminism or sjw's...

Why are they doiong these things? Maybe offering a consistently honest approach to them would help? Like you would keep pushing on the why and insist and prove to them that theyre honest will not be punished and waht they feel is bad. But somethign that should be honestly shared and considered.

This is exactly waht has been happened to me aswell. The differance is... the people there KNEW i was 50/50 likely to buy from the place they referred to the approatriate items and NOT return to them.