barn
-
Posts
1,787 -
Joined
-
Days Won
25
Everything posted by barn
-
Hi @elzoog Thinking about what could be the most valuable contribution I might have, that could be of actual utility for you...after the thread have been up for a while, several posts later... etc. (It's only my perspective, feel free to disregard it. Though I hope you give it a second thought.) Looking for 'an' answer and 'the' answer are two completely different endeavours, while seemingly both deals with 'answers', they result in opposite life choices. It is my current view that the topic and the responses it generated, for some reason isn't sufficient to encourage you to step out of a perspective that you had arrived in, when starting the thread. What to do next? I don't know. I tried responding to your last reply earlier on, but I'm unsure and in doubt... So, I hope you receive a fair compensation for what you had worked, what you are working for. Barnsley
-
196. Terry Callier - Ordinary Joe 197. Aluminium - I'm Bound To Pack It Up
-
194. Nicolas Bougaieff - Pulse Train Trapez 155 195. Blend Crafters - Bad Luck Blues
-
192. Howard Shore - The Bridge Of Khazad Dum 193. Ilaria Graziano - I Do
-
Hi @Jsbrads I’m not entirely sure what you’re saying here. I would be curious to see if you had any proof supporting whether time itself changed or if it was an idea of yours. Let me ask a few questions regarding the foundations here. 1. If there was a car with it’s headlights on, would the light being emitted by them travelling at c + V1 (V1, vehicle’s velocity and c, lightspeed)? Alternatively, how about if that same car was backing up, its light being emitted was travelling at c-V1 now? 2. If you took a deflated balloon and drew some dots on it, when inflating it you’d observe the points `gaining distance´ relative to each other. Similarly, did matter move faster than lightspeed in the early expansion stage of the universe or did the space in which it belongs expanded to make it seem like matter travelled at, faster than lightspeed? 3. If time itself slowly accelerated, wouldn’t it affect everything simultaneously and so we wouldn’t have anything to measure against anything?… irrelevancy? (inaccuracy = using your body as a ruler, measuring things with your arm's length when an adult, doesn’t mean things got smaller compared to when being a child) 4. If some things were affected by time slowing down (other than time dilatation) in some parts of our universe (e.g. bus with a walking passanger, pedestrian onlooker’s perspective...), why haven’t we simply picked it up using triangulation/spectograpy for example(*2)?
-
Hello @MercurySunlight Euw... Glad it brightened you up. Indeed, Canada is a peculiar place in space-time, especially now-a-days. (Munchies are universal .)
-
Hi @Frederik Well, my two first posts contains that... (argument, proof for my argument) Would you like to ask any questions to see if your interpretation is accurate? Feel free to do so. p. s. (I don't remember being friends. Otherwise, please don't imply that. I'm not sure if it's genuine or condescending. Thanks.) -
Hi @Frederik I'm happy to answer your question. Have you got any? Barnsley p. s. (Nice, I also follow Mike Maloney's work. He seems legitimate.)
-
190. Linkin Park - Session 191. Mos Def & Massive Attack - I Against I
-
188. Hans Zimmer - Flying Drone 189. Charles Camille Saint-Säens - Danse Macabre
-
Hi @Jsbrads If that was the case, shouldn't we have picked up on it when using triangulation or if not luminosity measurements? I mean, plotting the data over the observable space, we'd have already noticed uniform or not shifts in brightness. Isn't that true?
-
Without inviting too much debates regarding pole shifts, it's been well established that hematite and other magnetic minerals can be used to date geological samples, establish past magnetic fields... etc. If there was a different gravity pulling on the surface millions of years ago, we should observe different distances between sediment layers compared with earlier/later samples in similar circumstances. Heavier materials wouldn't have compacted the same for example. Has that been demonstrated to be the case? (I haven't seen it, yet)
-
Hi @Siegfried von Walheim I'm happy with how and what I have provided for you (and maybe others). All my arguments and essential information is there, I'm sure you are well-equipped to make up your own mind regarding what to make of it. I felt, I had to share it and glad I did...even if seemingly it bounced off/you don't consider it of value. Have a good one, Barnsley p.s. (risk assessment over anecdotes)
-
Druggy Arachnids of Hinterland
-
185. Lemon Jelly - It was... 186. Mint Royale ft. Gene Kelly - Singing In The Rain (remix) 187. Queens Of The Stone Age - No One Knows (David Eric Grohl - anyone heard of Nirvana, Foo Fighters, Them Crooked Vultures? Well, he's on drums in 'No One Knows')
-
Thanks, gonna have a peek at it. Fascinating read. Very interesting. So, giraffes wear compression socks if I understood it correctly. Fab! (Just kidding) The answers, as I see it regarding size, lie in the physiological-adaptative manifestations and the reproductive strategies the Dinos 'used'. [The following article isn't as varied but upon searching around for a bit, seemed like a good start to give you a rundown on the physics (a little bit, not too dense). It'll explain why gravity hasn't changed much since after the Hadean period (Hades, mythology), after the end of 'heavy-bombardment' basically.] Fun facts (hopefully I'm not annoying anyone... do tell, if so) ° the earth is actually weightless, unless we introduce a perspective that needs another object with mass. ° the earth has a healthy ~ 6 * 10^24 Kg mass ° spacedust and charged particles are what increase earth's mass(mainly) , while escaping hydrogen and helium that accounts for the losses... roughly 'guestimated' = 1 * 10^6 Kg loss per year, compared to the total weight 6*10^24,... not sure if this is of an issue, was, will ever be. caveats (not constant, very hard to count flying helium atoms or label spacedust particles... too boring)
-
H.A.W. / 15. Venetian Snares - Hajnal edit,17-03-2018: (to voter) ?, (I guess, I might thank you. Thank you!)
-
Good for you, man. If you decide to drop a line in the future, I'll be reading that.
-
Sure, besides their successful strategy of adaptative and reproductive measures, compared to other creatures. I asked about the mass gain of the earth, because the concepts of weight and gravity are closely related. (i.e. a balloon rising in the atmosphere expanding-inflating, doesn't gain any mass while its weight is being reduced, resulting from the gravity affecting it less as it moves 'up') Tectonic movements are still part of an active debate, the 'expanding earth theory'... not so much. {Keary and Vine’s (Global Tectonics, Blackwell, 1990)} I have not seen any evidence of it being the case. Not seeing, doesn't mean it can't exist. Although, seeing evidence of the cooling of the earth doesn't help the notion neither as objects when cooled seem to shrink rather. And as with the radioactive decay (amongst other factors) providing fuel for the core but with a limited lifespan, the process is somewhat going to be measurable with a greater accuracy of the mantle-core composition. All in all, we do speak in terms of 10^9, 1 000 000 000 years, right?! Giggles. I don't think less than a percentage of difference is the main driver. Fuschia - FF0080 (Couldn't help but notice, it, tagging along for a while now.) Okay. Thanks, gonna have a peek at it. I consider that thoughtful, I suppose. p.s. (Really? Over ten years? Uncommon.)
-
It's not a test. (Is it possible, you thought of the Big 5 assessment?) Past authoring suit is a tool for you to make sense of where you are approaching this moment you call, you.
-
Oh, yeah. Definitely. Why would you invest into realising your true potential, when hedonism can give you a quick way out into oblivion...(empathetic smirk) The choice is yours, now it's you who dictates your life's terms. I don't think I can come up with a more compelling argument, here, now, in the ad-hoc moment of things. You're a smart guy. (I'm probably not mistaken in that neither)
-
Then, I wouldn't go making big decisions at all. I (personally) would do a detailed inventory first, ask myself the stern question with a booming voice : Who ARE you? I mean, have you considered doing Jordan B. Peterson's past authoring suit?
-
183. Matt Uelmen - Tristam 184. Dougie MacLean - Goodnight And Joy
-
Hi @FutureBankRobber No problem, wanted to check with you. The lure of an easy way out is always going to be an option, until you have really internalised its cost. Having read what you provided, I dare to take the guess that you've never felt really engaged in something bigger than you or challenged by a higher purpose or a large enough goal to achieve. Am I completely off base?
-
Sorry, wrong place. or Was it a bad joke? Barnsley
